Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
Awareness is the backbone of conservation. By empowering individuals together, driving policy support, encouraging transparency and accountability, and raising awareness, a ripple effect is created that spreads knowledge across communities. In simpler words, if people know better, they should do better. But in reality, being “well-informed” rarely translates into conservation action. This failure to translate knowledge into meaningful conservation action hints at an environmental paradox that is visible everywhere.
Studies in the US and India reveal a stark disconnect: a persistent hesitation toward individual changes—influenced by economic priorities and lifestyle comforts—persists despite support for environmental policies. Even escalating environmental challenges like global warming and climate change fail to bridge this gap, which demands urgent individual action without waiting for governments or corporations.
America’s Warming Worry with Action Gap
Updated surveys from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University (2024) reveal that 73% of people believe global warming is happening, 60% think it is manmade, and 64% feel at least somewhat worried about it—but only 38% often talk about it with their families. Nearly 70% of people oppose raising energy taxes to change behaviour and instead prefer incentives like tax breaks, reflecting a political divide.
Despite 46% of people perceiving personal harm risks from climate change, factors like fear of economic costs, political polarisation, and weak social norms continue to hinder meaningful action.
Indian Reality: From Survival to Status
In India, this gap isn’t just about psychology; it’s about the massive divide in how we live. For the millions struggling below the poverty line, “environmentalism” is a luxury they can’t afford, and survival is always a big question. When you’re dealing with heatwaves and floods while trying to find your next meal, expecting them to think about ecology and environment is not only unrealistic but unjust.
Then there’s our booming middle class. Elated by increasing incomes, over 400 million people pursue consumption-driven happiness through cars, air conditioners, and packaged goods. This lifestyle generates nearly 62 million tonnes of urban waste each year. Though many citizens take commendable eco-friendly actions—using cloth bags, planting trees, or switching to electric vehicles amid worsening air pollution—they often overlook systemic concerns such as water wastage, waste generation, public transport neglect, and post-planting tree care. Sustainable habits like conscious shopping, waste reduction, and water conservation remain limited, as people struggle to reconcile their rising aspirations with the environmental costs of their choices.
At the top, India’s elite classes are growing rapidly with GDP gains producing millionaires by the millions. They have a tremendous capacity for positive impact—to become perfect role models as doers rather than preachers. They know the Himalayan glaciers are melting, forests are degrading, and air and water are polluting, but they prefer luxury travel, opulent lifestyles, and mansions—mirroring Western patterns where the fear of leaving their comfort zone blocks action.
Greed, Growth, and Gap
In the Indian context, the tragedy of the commons hits home, where selfish greed outweighs the shared need for precious resources like water, air, and forests. We often ignore sustainable habits like recycling and reusing, feeling our efforts are wasted if neighbours continue to litter. Meaningful conservation has been replaced by “photo-op” activism: planting a tree is celebrated, but its long-term survival through post-planting care is ignored. Despite ambitious national climate promises like NDCs, weak enforcement and misplaced priorities prevent these goals from being met. Finally, this gap between what we know and how we act only widens, leaving our natural resources and future generations at serious risk.
Together We Win
For Indians across our diverse socio-economic spectrum, real environmental progress demands collective action across income classes, each contributing within its capacity. For the underprivileged, enabling policies for livelihood support and incentives are crucial for sustainable resource use—like restoration, farming, fishing, soil conservation, and renewable energy adoption—where livelihood security counters survival pressures and environmental care brings climate resilience.
The middle class can embrace lifestyle transitions beyond environmental tokenism by adopting sustainable and aspirational living: low-carbon choices, reduced consumption, waste segregation, energy conservation, and preference for shared mobility.
Finally, our elite—with ample resources, philanthropic potential, and influence—need to become doers rather than preachers by supporting green and sustainable enterprises involving clean energy, restoration, and public utilities.
An action-based response from this trinity transforms awareness into reality, linking grassroots resilience, consumer accountability and conscious leadership. Let’s not forget that environmental conservation is not a luxury but a shared responsibility. Acting on Gandhiji’s quote, “Be the change you wish to see in the world,” these three classes can dismantle the paradox of inaction by aligning individual choices with ecological needs and securing a resilient future for all. True happiness lies not in excess but in equilibrium with nature, for which awareness-backed action becomes the essential tool to reach that equilibrium.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.