Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
Introduction
India’s march toward rapid urbanization and economic development is heavily reliant on the strength of its housing sector. While policy measures and subsidies have provided a significant push, a subtle but crucial impediment remains: the continued use of the Rule of 78 in interest calculations for housing loans. This archaic formula not only erodes consumer fairness but directly stifles the ability of Indian households to refinance or prepay their loans—two key drivers of financial flexibility and capital flow. Reforming this rule could transform the Indian mortgage landscape, unlocking vast reserves of capital and catalyzing home ownership.
The Rule of 78: How It Works and Why It Matters
The Rule of 78 is a method that front-loads interest payments in the early years of a loan, with each subsequent installment containing progressively less interest and more principal. Unlike the reducing balance method—where interest is charged only on the outstanding principal—borrowers under the Rule of 78 pay the bulk of their interest up front.
This hidden complexity doesn’t just result in higher costs; it severely penalizes those who want to prepay or refinance their home loans. In a country where mobility, changing income, and market conditions often prompt borrowers to seek more favorable terms, this restriction has a deep, negative ripple effect across the economy.
The Prepayment Penalty: Locking Up Household Capital
Prepaying a loan should be a sign of financial prudence and stability. However, under the Rule of 78, Indian homeowners find that prepaying early in their tenure saves them very little in interest because most of the interest is already paid off in the initial years. This not only discourages financial discipline but traps families in less advantageous loan contracts. It also prevents them from redirecting their capital into other productive uses—be it investments, business ventures, or improving quality of life.
If the reducing balance method were mandated, prepayment would immediately translate to substantial interest savings. Households would feel empowered to accelerate their payments without fear of wasted capital, creating a culture of financial strength and flexibility. This freedom to prepay also means that banks get their capital back sooner, which can then be recycled into new loans, further fueling growth.
The Refinancing Roadblock: Stifling Competition and Innovation
Refinancing—switching to a lower interest rate or better loan terms—is a vital mechanism in modern economies. It enables borrowers to take advantage of falling rates, improved credit profiles, or more competitive offers from lenders. Yet, under the Rule of 78, Indian borrowers are discouraged from refinancing because the lion’s share of interest has already been paid in the early years. Switching lenders midway saves little or nothing, removing the financial incentive to seek better deals.
This lack of mobility stifles competition among lenders, keeping interest rates artificially high and reducing innovation in financial products. If the reducing balance method were adopted, borrowers would be more willing to refinance, forcing lenders to offer more attractive terms, spurring efficiency and customer-centricity in the banking sector. The increased churn would ensure that capital flows to its most productive use, rather than being locked in uncompetitive legacy loans.
Macroeconomic Impact: Unlocking Housing Capital
The cumulative effect of easier prepayment and refinancing is profound. When households can quickly react to changing circumstances—whether it’s a drop in interest rates or a surge in disposable income—there is more liquidity and confidence in the market. Freed capital finds its way into new housing, home improvements, small businesses, and consumption, all of which drive GDP growth. Developers see increased demand, financial institutions benefit from a more dynamic market, and India’s aspiration for mass home ownership comes closer to reality.
Conclusion
India’s housing sector stands at the threshold of a revolution, needing only a nudge from smart regulatory reform. By discarding the obsolete Rule of 78 and embracing the reducing balance method, India can remove unfair prepayment and refinancing barriers, liberate household capital, and inject powerful momentum into the housing and banking sectors. This reform is a low-hanging fruit—one that promises not just to empower individual homeowners, but also to unlock the vast economic potential that comes from a thriving, mobile, and competitive housing finance market. It is time for India to act and seize this opportunity for inclusive growth.
Note: Took ChatGpt help to write this.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.