Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
History, it seems, loves to repeat itself not as a perfect mirror but as an echo that grows louder across centuries. The name Muhammad bin Tughluq once evoked both awe and exhaustion in medieval India a ruler of extraordinary intellect, imagination, and daring, yet whose reign descended into chaos because his ideas were far ahead of the age and far detached from ground reality. Today, one sees an uncanny resemblance in the figure of Donald J. Trump, whose political presence has divided the American landscape with similar intensity.
Both men stand as testaments to what happens when vision races ahead of wisdom, when leadership turns into a theater of excess and when nations, tired yet entranced, oscillate between disbelief and reluctant surrender.
The Paradox of Brilliance
Muhammad Tughluq was not a fool; far from it. He was perhaps one of the most intellectually capable rulers of his time a man who read Greek philosophy, practiced calligraphy, and sought to unify his empire with administrative foresight. But what history remembers are not his intentions, but his failures the move of his capital from Delhi to Daulatabad, which exhausted both people and resources; his experiment with token currency, which opened the floodgates of forgery; and his tax reforms, which drove farmers into despair.
Trump’s story, centuries apart, carries the same rhythm a mix of audacious ambition and self-defeating execution. His “America First” policy, his border wall, his trade wars, his erratic foreign diplomacy all stemmed from an underlying belief that disruption equals strength. Like Tughluq, Trump sees himself as a misunderstood visionary surrounded by mediocrity. And like Tughluq, he too often mistook shock for strategy.
In both cases, the result was not reform but fatigue societies left weary by constant change, unpredictability, and rhetoric without restoration.
When the Ruled Grow Weary
The tragedy of Tughluq was not only his failure but the public’s exhaustion. The people of Delhi once loyal and proud became disillusioned. His frequent policy reversals, impulsive decrees, and disregard for the common man’s suffering led to quiet rebellion. By the end of his reign, the Sultan stood alone a brilliant man trapped in the ruins of his own restlessness.
Trump’s America, in many ways, reflects the same emotional fatigue. His first term was not merely a political administration but an ongoing performance part governance, part grievance. The machinery of state became secondary to the stage of self. Even after his exit, the country remains caught in a Trumpian echo chamber, with a section of the population clinging to his mythos as if it were a lost religion.
Whereas the subjects of Tughluq simply waited for his rule to pass, many Americans seem unable to detach. They continue to orbit his rhetoric whether in anger or admiration. The fatigue is not merely political; it’s psychological. America, like Tughluq’s Delhi, is a land that wants peace but cannot stop watching the spectacle.
The Mirage of the Mastermind
One of the most fascinating parallels between the two men lies in how they cultivated the illusion of genius. Tughluq believed his intellect gave him the right to redesign the world. Trump, too, sold himself as the man who “alone could fix it.” Both men mastered the art of confidence as strategy.
But genius, when isolated from empathy and grounded reasoning, turns into tyranny of thought. Tughluq’s empire suffered not because of malice, but because his ideas outpaced his infrastructure. Similarly, Trump’s policies often collapsed under the weight of their own bravado slogans without systems, declarations without depth.
The danger of such leadership is not only what it does but what it inspires. It teaches followers that certainty matters more than truth, that dominance is wisdom, and that emotion is a substitute for governance.
From Empire to Republic the Continuum of Chaos
A medieval despot and a modern populist, it would be tempting to see these two figures as opposites but, the thread that binds them is the politics of spectacle. Both thrived on unpredictability. Both manipulated the art of fear and fascination.
Tughluq’s subjects could never guess his next move. Trump’s followers and foes alike watched his every tweet with the same mix of dread and awe. The medium has changed from royal proclamations to social media storms but, the psychology remains constant. In both cases, governance became a live experiment in control and chaos.
The empire of Tughluq ultimately shrank, leaving him isolated and misunderstood. The question that lingers for America is whether its institutions can endure the same stress test where governance bends around the will of one individual and the public discourse becomes an endless referendum on personality.
When a Nation Becomes a Mirror
Perhaps the cruelest irony is that both leaders emerged not in a vacuum but from within societies already craving strong voices. Tughluq’s people longed for a ruler of intellect after years of instability; Americans, weary of bureaucracy and political correctness, sought an anti-politician.
What neither society realized was that they were not electing reformers but reflections. The leaders they got were mirrors amplifying their restlessness, their desire for quick fixes, their hunger for spectacle. Both reigns remind us that a leader’s madness often begins as the people’s wish.
The Unfinished Legacy
Trump, too, represents a paradox the capacity to galvanize millions, to awaken political participation, and yet squander it all in noise and grievance.
The intelligence Muhammad Tughluq remains a tragic symbol of what could have been, one of the best in history had it met with patience, could have redefined India’s history.
Both will be remembered less for what they achieved and more for how they made people feel anxious, divided, and suspended between admiration and exasperation.
The Age of Unrest
To call Trump “a Muhammad Tughluq” is not an insult but a warning. It’s a reminder that power without pause is perilous, and that vision without grounding breeds exhaustion. Tughluq ruled by decree; Trump rules by declaration. Both transformed governance into a stage where conviction mattered more than coherence.
History, however, is merciless to such leaders. When the play ends and the crowds disperse, what remains is silence and a nation counting the cost of charisma.
If Tughluq’s Delhi waited for his exit in silent suffering, Trump’s America lingers in his shadow unsure whether to move on or to keep replaying the past. And perhaps, that is the greater tragedy: that in both cases, the ruler may have left the throne, but the kingdom never really woke up.
Politics of spectacle.
Both thrived on unpredictability. Both manipulated the art of fear and fascination.
Tughluq’s subjects could never guess his next move. Trump’s followers and foes alike watched his every tweet with the same mix of dread and awe. The medium has changed from royal proclamations to social media storms but, the psychology remains constant. In both cases, governance became a live experiment in control and chaos.
The empire of Tughluq ultimately shrank, leaving him isolated and misunderstood. The question that lingers for America is whether its institutions can endure the same stress test — where governance bends around the will of one individual and the public discourse becomes an endless referendum on personality.
When a Nation Becomes a Mirror
Perhaps the cruelest irony is that both leaders emerged not in a vacuum but from within societies already craving strong voices. Tughluq’s people longed for a ruler of intellect after years of instability; Americans, weary of bureaucracy and political correctness, sought an anti-politician.
What neither society realized was that they were not electing reformers but reflections. The leaders they got were mirrors amplifying their restlessness, their desire for quick fixes, their hunger for spectacle. Both reigns remind us that a leader’s madness often begins as the people’s wish.
The Unfinished Legacy
Trump, too, represents a paradox the capacity to galvanize millions, to awaken political participation, and yet squander it all in noise and grievance.
The intelligence Muhammad Tughluq remains a tragic symbol of what could have been, one of the best in history had it met with patience, could have redefined India’s history.
Both will be remembered less for what they achieved and more for how they made people feel anxious, divided, and suspended between admiration and exasperation.
And finally, to call Trump “a Muhammad Tughluq” is not an insult but a warning. It’s a reminder that power without pause is perilous, and that vision without grounding breeds exhaustion. Tughluq ruled by decree; Trump rules by declaration. Both transformed governance into a stage where conviction mattered more than coherence.
History, however, is merciless to such leaders. When the play ends and the crowds disperse, what remains is silence and a nation counting the cost of charisma.
If Tughluq’s Delhi waited for his exit in silent suffering, Trump’s America lingers in his shadow unsure whether to move on or to keep replaying the past. And perhaps, that is the greater tragedy: that in both cases, the ruler may have left the throne, but the kingdom never really woke up.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.