RSS was equall partner in 1984 riots when they took the opportunity to target sikh as RSS and its affiliates were victims at the hands of Sikh militants in Punjab and no wonder Congress manged to win almost 400 seats in 1984.
Congress should have disclosed its plan to contain the RSS, just to avoid a new talking point, only after it had won in MP. Although it doesn’t sound likely that someone who has made up his mind to vote against the BJP will change it on hearing of Congress’s plan about the RSS, but why give a chance for a new controversy? RSS has lost INDEPENDENT sympathy and identity, though Mr Chari may not agree. It has too CLOSELY identified itself with the BJP of “Gujarat model”. RSS has been in existence for nearly 100 years, but they were never known for “murderous” hatred for Muslims. Now if the Congress is displaying a new “alarm” about the RSS, I think it is justified.
RSS was equall partner in 1984 riots when they took the opportunity to target sikh as RSS and its affiliates were victims at the hands of Sikh militants in Punjab and no wonder Congress manged to win almost 400 seats in 1984.
Congress should have disclosed its plan to contain the RSS, just to avoid a new talking point, only after it had won in MP. Although it doesn’t sound likely that someone who has made up his mind to vote against the BJP will change it on hearing of Congress’s plan about the RSS, but why give a chance for a new controversy? RSS has lost INDEPENDENT sympathy and identity, though Mr Chari may not agree. It has too CLOSELY identified itself with the BJP of “Gujarat model”. RSS has been in existence for nearly 100 years, but they were never known for “murderous” hatred for Muslims. Now if the Congress is displaying a new “alarm” about the RSS, I think it is justified.