While I understand the essence of your article, there are certain factual inaccuracies within. A notable one is “Akhilesh Yadav is here only due to the Constitution, otherwise he would be shepherding some landlord’s buffaloes back in Safai” as the context is not appropriately stated as the UP CM was referring to remarks allegedly made by Fmr. UP CM Mayawati on Akhilesh Yadav. Look at this for proof: https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/akhileshs-priest-jibe-response-to-yogis-shepherd-730044.html . I think it would have been more appropriate to provide CM benefit of doubt since he claims to be quoting Mayawati.
While I understand the essence of your article, there are certain factual inaccuracies within. A notable one is “Akhilesh Yadav is here only due to the Constitution, otherwise he would be shepherding some landlord’s buffaloes back in Safai” as the context is not appropriately stated as the UP CM was referring to remarks allegedly made by Fmr. UP CM Mayawati on Akhilesh Yadav. Look at this for proof: https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/akhileshs-priest-jibe-response-to-yogis-shepherd-730044.html . I think it would have been more appropriate to provide CM benefit of doubt since he claims to be quoting Mayawati.