Before writing such a strong opiniated comment one should themselves makes some research, there is enough evidence that temple existed below Babari masjid.
I dont support the fact that babri should’ve been destroyed but if your argument is there was no temple there then sorry my friend there was.
Before writing such filthy opinion, the author should be aware that the supreme court has clearly stated that there was no evidence that a temple existed at the place of babri masjid.
Before writing such a strong opiniated comment one should themselves makes some research, there is enough evidence that temple existed below Babari masjid.
I dont support the fact that babri should’ve been destroyed but if your argument is there was no temple there then sorry my friend there was.
Before writing such filthy opinion, the author should be aware that the supreme court has clearly stated that there was no evidence that a temple existed at the place of babri masjid.