Overpopulation is a concept that’s hovered over the Earth’s future for some time.
It has inspired many works, including Stephen Emmott’s 10 Billion, which outlines a future of food shortages, energy wars and civil conflict.
But what if studies invoking concerns about a fast-rising world population were wrong? That could be the case, according to The University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, which challenges the assumptions behind predictions for continued growth and says a declining and ageing population will be key future challenges.
That sets it at odds with the United Nations which predicts that the global population will continue to grow, albeit at a slower pace, and will reach 10.9 billion in 2100, up from around 7.7 billion people in 2019.
Why do these predictions matter?
Understanding how populations could evolve matters because future population sizes underpin future strategies for governments and industries around the world; they need to plan for key investments in infrastructure or goals for international development and carbon emission reductions. A decline, instead of an increase, would have many implications.
“Our forecasts for a shrinking world population have positive implications for the environment, climate change, and food production,” the researchers, led by Professor Stein Emil Vollset, wrote. “But possible negative implications for labour forces, economic growth, and social support systems.”
How do the world population predictions vary?
The world population may peak in 2064 at 9.7 billion and then decline to around 8.8 billion by 2100, the University of Washington researchers wrote in The Lancet.
The UN’s prediction of 10.9 billion by 2100 is based, at least in part, on “the unprecedented ageing of the world’s population”, as well as “rapid population growth driven by high fertility” in some countries and regions.
Whereas, the University of Washington’s researchers argue that a population decline will be linked to the attainment of developmental goals, for example the education of women and girls and their access to contraception.
“The different outcomes reflect the uncertainty in making projections over such a long time period,” says Leontine Alkema, a statistical modeller at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, discussing discrepancies in population data for a Nature article.
An inversion of the population pyramid is likely to occur by 2100 according to our study on population forecasting. #GBDstudy By 2100, we forecast 2.37 billion people older than 65 compared to 1.7 billion younger than 20.
Learn more in @TheLancet ➡️https://t.co/jqe2uXXMtP pic.twitter.com/0u9mJyKIcH
— Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) (@IHME_UW) July 26, 2020
The world’s population continues to grow, but at slower pace than any time since 1950.
By 2050, 9.7 billion people are expected to live on our ?.
Latest #UNPopulation trends: https://t.co/gVmJKErM4F pic.twitter.com/2HbWhz1iJe
— United Nations (@UN) June 17, 2019
“It’s kind of an impossible exercise and so we do the best we can and it’s good that different groups use different approaches.”
This article was originally published in The World Economic Forum.
Also read: India has a people problem — its human resources aren’t infinite