Is PM Modi allowing Trump to play policeman in India-Pakistan tensions over Kashmir?
Talk Point

Is PM Modi allowing Trump to play policeman in India-Pakistan tensions over Kashmir?

PM Narendra Modi Monday held his first conversation with US President Donald Trump on the Kashmir issue since the abrogation of Article 370 as well as the latter's offer to mediate.

   

Illustration by Arindam Mukherjee | ThePrint Team

PM Narendra Modi Monday held his first conversation with US President Donald Trump on the Kashmir issue since the abrogation of Article 370 as well as the latter’s offer to mediate. Trump later asked Pakistan PM Imran Khan to consider the “need to reduce tensions and moderate rhetoric with India”.

ThePrint asks: Is PM Modi allowing Trump to play policeman in India-Pakistan tensions over Kashmir?


During crisis situation, other countries have become active to defuse tension between India & Pakistan

Arun Singh
Former Indian Ambassador to the US

India’s consistent position has been that there is no scope for any third-party role in India-Pakistan issues, including Jammu and Kashmir. However, during a crisis situation, other countries have become active to defuse the tension.

We have seen this during the Kargil conflict in 1999, after the terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001 and the subsequent response and mobilisation of troops by India, and after this year’s terror attack in Pulwama and the counter-terror action taken by India in Balakot.

US President Donald Trump’s phone call with India’s Prime Minster Narendra Modi and Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan Monday was in line with this. In his tweet after the two calls, he referred to working towards ‘reducing tensions’. In February this year, along with the US, several other countries too were reportedly active in defusing the situation and working for the release of the captured Indian Air Force pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman.

While President Trump has spoken to the Prime Ministers of both the countries and asked Pakistan to tone down its rhetoric, he cannot be seen as playing the role of a policeman.


India has embarked on a perilous path and must be stopped

Abdul Basit
Former Pakistan High Commissioner to India

Under PM Modi, India is openly flouting democratic principles and international norms. So, it becomes incumbent upon the international community to take full cognisance of what the Modi government is up to and how dangerous it is to regional peace and stability. India has embarked on a perilous path and must be stopped.

It is not surprising that within India many opposition parties have rejected the unilateral abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, and called the move ‘mala fide’ and ‘unconstitutional’.

Under the irrefutable norm of international law ‘Erga Omnes’ (towards all), it is the responsibility of all states to ensure that the right to self-determination is not obstructed or violated. The US and other major powers must wake up to their international obligations rather than sulk in their commercial and economic interests.

Kashmiris too have unanimously rejected the unconstitutional amendments. PM Modi needs to introspect. He can never succeed in suppressing Kashmiris. India has no right to suppress the fundamental human rights of Kashmiris and endanger regional stability. PM Modi is playing with fire.


Also read: India’s No First Use is badass enough. Modi govt needn’t change it to be more muscular


The real issue is how the Modi govt can deal with a powerful stakeholder like Trump while moving forward

Pranay Kotasthane
Fellow & Faculty at Takshashila Institution

Policeman is an incorrect metaphor to use. The act of policing involves ensuring compliance with an underlying rule of law. No such enforceable force of law exists in the domain of international relations. Instead, power is the currency in international relations. It is precisely for this reason that Trump’s stance and actions on India-Pakistan tensions are important following the Narendra Modi government’s move to abrogate Article 370.

The real issue then is how the Modi government can deal with a powerful stakeholder like Trump now. While India needs the US in order to increase its own economic and military power, the US-China structural rivalry makes India a very important player in the US strategic calculation. Pakistan doesn’t feature in any of these forces driving the India-US equation.

For its part, Pakistan will try to use the Kashmir issue to drive a wedge between the US and India. From Pakistan’s standpoint, returning to the India-Pakistan hyphenation era in the eyes of the US is desirable. And given Pakistan’s role in the ongoing talks between the US and the Taliban, Pakistan’s case is likely to carry more weight than it otherwise would. India’s challenge will be to continue isolating the US-India relationship from the ongoing India-Pakistan dynamic. This task will become more challenging if the security situation in Kashmir worsens.


Any outside intervention will be fraught with serious consequences for both India and Pakistan

Avinash Mohananey
Former Intelligence Officer posted in Kashmir & Islamabad

Kashmir evokes strong sentiments on both sides of the India-Pakistan border. In both countries, domestic electoral politics remain hostage to the Kashmir issue. The rhetoric was bound to be shriller from Pakistan’s side after India changed the constitutional status of Jammu and Kashmir.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, the civilian façade of the Pakistan Army, has been pushed to a situation where he will have to now go by what his army decides on India. And this would only mean more violence unleashed on India through its proxies.

The call between PM Modi and President Trump should be seen in this perspective. Everyone would agree that the international pressure on Pakistan has to be relentless.

At the same time, India should remember that right now, the main priority for Trump in the region is to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan. Whether we like it or not, Pakistan is the key to delivering what Trump wants before he faces the next US presidential elections.

It is a harsh reality that no country is an honest interlocutor. Any outside intervention will be fraught with serious consequences for both India and Pakistan.

The Indian leadership realised this long back. Having seen the play by world powers in the UN, it was wise on India’s part to make Kashmir a bilateral issue with Pakistan after signing the Simla Agreement and the Lahore Declaration.


Also read: This is why PM Modi doesn’t really care about internationalisation of Kashmir issue


Will not call Trump’s act mediation. It is his goodwill – he’s staking his reputation by making this offer

Zahid Syed
Former Pakistan Ambassador

I wouldn’t use the word policeman because that would be an incorrect analogy in international relations. US President Donald Trump is staking his reputation and trying to mediate. In fact, I would not even call it mediation, I would refer to it as goodwill. Neither India nor Pakistan should see this as an unfriendly act. Trump’s offer should be welcomed.

If this issue is not mediated or discussed by the US, then there is a possibility that the situation will worsen and both India and Pakistan will suffer. Most Pakistanis are in favour of this mediation. They appreciate Donald Trump’s sentiments.

What must be understood is that both the countries involved are not speaking to each other, and there is a lot of suspicion. Trump will not dictate terms – he will only facilitate a dialogue. We have been handling the Kashmir issue bilaterally for many years now.

One must also realise that during the recent Lok Sabha elections, the Indian nationalist propaganda was whipped up to such an extent that it had made it difficult to handle a situation like this with Pakistan. But this also emboldened Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to unilaterally take the Kashmir decision.

The right of Kashmiris to self-determination has been completely disregarded. Pakistan is providing both political and moral support to the Kashmiris.

Finally, it is also important to understand what an international dispute entails. When two countries cannot agree on an issue and go to an international forum, then the issue becomes an international dispute.


In post-Cold War era, every US govt has had an inherent intention of mediating in the Kashmir issue

Nayanima Basu
Diplomacy Editor at ThePrint

India has always maintained that it does not want any country to intervene on matters that are bilateral in nature vis-a-vis Pakistan, especially on the Kashmir dispute. This is one of the main reasons why India denounced the role of UNMOGIP (United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan) post the Simla Agreement of 1972, which clearly stated that Kashmir will be treated as a bilateral issue between New Delhi and Islamabad.

However, what needs to be understood here is that in the post-Cold War era, every successive US administration has had an inherent intention of mediating in the Kashmir issue. Although, the US first attempted to mediate in the dispute in 1962, it intensified its attempts following the end of the Cold War. In the 1980s, the Reagan administration gave its consent for a multibillion-dollar military and economic assistance package to Pakistan, which continues to date although its size has reduced drastically.

President Clinton also wanted to be a mediator in the Kashmir issue and resolve it once and for all during the 1999 Kargil conflict. Coming to President Trump, he has openly spoken about his ambitions to resolve the Kashmir issue.

But today, with the scrapping of Kashmir’s special status, the great game in the Himalayan region has changed. What Trump may be planning to do right now is something that PM Modi knows all too well. The US does not want any further movement or changes by either India or Pakistan — as far as issues concerning the Line of Control, the Line of Actual Control and the International Border are concerned. Apart from this, the Trump administration’s biggest priority remains the withdrawal of its troops from Afghanistan.

So, it remains to be seen if Modi will allow Trump to play the role of a policeman, given that the choices are limited.


Also read: Imran Khan used Modi excuse to give Bajwa extension. But General can’t save him from rivals


By Revathi Krishnan and Taran Deol