In episode 622 of #CutTheClutter, ThePrint’s Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta lists 10 important cases the top court should have heard in the last few years.
Addressing Muslim women via video link at an event marking the first anniversary of the law, Naqvi said after its enactment, triple talaq cases have come down drastically.
Prakash Javadekar along with other members of the BJP, hailed the positive impact of the law on the the first anniversary of the triple talaq bill's passage in Parliament.
Between Delhi and Bihar elections, it will become evident whether BJP’s vulnerabilities further concede space to opposition or are overcome by Modi-Shah duo.
Northeast unrest over citizenship law is hardly about secularism. People only want to protect their distinct tribal culture from Bengalis residing there.
Neither state govts nor companies earn large profits from lotteries. However, a look at the system shows there’s ample evidence of murky dealings and financial irregularities.
In an interview with Gulistan News this week, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said the government would leave law and order to J&K Police and slowly withdraw troops.
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
Is there anydifference SC in thatemergency period and present set up of SC? It is unfortunate that history repeating with more bad behaviour of our judicoary. Justice Shah said when judges are asked to toe the line of power that in, the judges went to the extent of Sastang PraNanam.
Fine column in IE by Shri Navroze Seervai today, following the one by Shri P B Mehta. The disquiet felt by ordinary citizens who may not be familiar with the differences between Articles 32 and 226 is bubbling up. The wise men and few women of the honourable apex court may be pleased to accept that this most respected / powerful public institution in the country is going through a period of exceptional stress. Something which recourse to the power to punish for contempt will not be able to exclude from widening circles of public discussion. Restrained, sober in the mainstream media, a little irreverent on social media, as happens in a genuine democracy. Retired Judges of the SC / HC are also speaking up with eloquence and passion.
Is there anydifference SC in thatemergency period and present set up of SC? It is unfortunate that history repeating with more bad behaviour of our judicoary. Justice Shah said when judges are asked to toe the line of power that in, the judges went to the extent of Sastang PraNanam.
Fine column in IE by Shri Navroze Seervai today, following the one by Shri P B Mehta. The disquiet felt by ordinary citizens who may not be familiar with the differences between Articles 32 and 226 is bubbling up. The wise men and few women of the honourable apex court may be pleased to accept that this most respected / powerful public institution in the country is going through a period of exceptional stress. Something which recourse to the power to punish for contempt will not be able to exclude from widening circles of public discussion. Restrained, sober in the mainstream media, a little irreverent on social media, as happens in a genuine democracy. Retired Judges of the SC / HC are also speaking up with eloquence and passion.