Labour leader Corbyn called for implementation of UN resolutions on Kashmir, ending consensus to treat it as a bilateral issue between India & Pakistan.
Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn faces heat over second referendum option and African Union urges DR Congo to suspend final results of presidential elections.
Donald...
BJP’s fate in the second phase of 2024 Lok Sabha election will be decided in Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Maharashtra, where it performed very well in 2019 but faces a stiff competition now.
The private lender's shares tumbled to be top Nifty 50 loser after India's central bank barred it from taking on new customers through online and mobile banking channels.
Another addition to military cooperation has been the Strategic Space Dialogue, inaugurated in Paris in 2023. Last month, India participated as an observer to France’s AsterX.
Sir,
It is BRITISHERS who ERUPTED INDO PAK PROBLEMS WAY BACK IN1909 by MORLEAY-MINTO REFORMS . After Recognising this Mistake , Montwgue – Chelmsford Reforms failed to Rectify This Mistake in 1919 and Ended with The PARTITION OF INDIA IN 1947.
For the last 72 years The HATE MONGERING PAKISTANIS ARE CREATING UNWANTED INHUMAN PROBLEMS IN KASHMIR .
In 1971 PAKISTAN was on it’s kneels after loosing The War, Smt Indira Gandhi Failed To SOLVE KASHMIR ISSUE FOR EVER Then.
Now , Our Beloved PM NARENDRAMODI has Taken Steps To SOLVE KASHMIRIS PROBLEMS . IT IS OUR PRIME DUTY TO SUPPORT HIM IN THE DEVLOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES.
PAKISTAN PM Sri .Imran Khan in his speech on 14/08/2019 has accepted that HINDUSTAN/ INDIA ATTACKED BALAKOTE IN RETALIATION TO PULWAMA TERRORIST ACT. That Means, NOW PAKISTANIS KNOW THAT INDIA WILL NOT SPARE THEM FOR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES AND PUNISH THEM IN A BEFITTING MANNER WITHOUT SPARING THEM FOR EVER.
EVERY ACTION DONE FOR OUR BETTERMENT IN OUR MOTHER LAND IS AN INTERNAL MATTER . HENCE NOBODY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO POKE THEIR NOSE IN OUR INTERNAL AFFAIRS.
With best wishes for betterment,
Yours truly,
Shiva Kumar.T.N.
These intellectual terrorists are working against India and spreading bad comments wherever they are. No other religion people will not comment or behave madly..At least one man Modiji came and doing something for this country. Let’s wait and give him some space. Idiots will not give any solutions but criticise like eunochs. Britishers actually created this problem and in coming 10 years surely so many separist movements on religious griunds will happen in UK
,,,,, this is reality they will face it..
Kashmiris will be benefited with removal of 370 move and pls understand situation of new youth in Kashmir and keep away them to go into wrong path and pain day to day all Kashmiris were suffering..
What was a temporary provision in the Indian constitution removed altogether. Why Britain and it’s party is taking aggressive stance on it. And this nation is notorious for it’s racial stand and inhuman activities. The pages of history not yet effaced British colonial period era on this subcontinent.
Actually India had taught the world that every thing is fair to get votes in elections. This is what
happened in usa and labour in England is trying to copy the same. Modified version of divide and rule given by us is being accepted now everywhere in the power game
I don’t feel comfortable with this line, “… Constitutional changes are India’s internal matter… “. It does not quite sound complete, but I am unable to think up a convincing argument. Are ALL constitutional changes a country’s internal matter? Let me try this:
Suppose at a given time there are aeroplanes from the USA, UK, Zimbabwe, Croatia and a few other countries parked at different Indian airports for refueling. Suddenly Narendra Modi passes a rule that, “all aeroplanes on Indian territory are India’s property”, and simultaneously he locks up the ambassadors and other staff of these countries’ embassies. What happens then?
These are not constitutional changes but government hostile actions.
Sanjiv, what you conveniently ignored while comparing a constitutional amendment, or any legislative action by duly elected representative and a decision to seize property and assets of foreign countries that both are two separate instances. What you do internally and what you do externally are totally different. Seizing assets of other countries is an infringement of diplomatic decisions, which are never taken without mutual discussion. You SHOULD know that airplanes of other countries come for landing/refilling ONLY if Govt of India has already approved it. You can not abrogate such decisions as it is tantamount to not respecting the sovereign integrity of that nation. It is a direct breach of international conventions and that country would be justified in resorting to military action. They then would have full right to seize Indian assets abroad.
What food you eat in your house is your prerogative, what you do outside your house would, whether in public place or someone’s house would invite others to take against against you.
Hope you would have understood, and you don’t try this.
Anil, thanks for a calm and reasoned rejection of what I wrote, instead of something like Pallab Das’ impatient rejection, calling me a terrorist. Actually I too wasn’t convinced about the example I gave, but it sounded funny so I let it go. Let us not be very serious all the time.
This subject of Kashmir has been hot for quite some time. 370 has happened only now. I remember that I have commented many times right here, on THE PRINT, that we were close to internationalization of this subject. Pakistan always wanted it, Narendra Modi has leant them a helping hand by this decision. My simple question is this : If it was India’s internal matter, and so desirable from India’s standpoint, then why was this decision not taken in the entire 70 years? Including 6 of Atal ji’s government.
You know, Modi has in fact made the FINAL solution of the Kashmir problem EXTREMELY EASY. I may again be called a terrorist by P Das. Let this be the final division of the Kashmir pie – – now that India has claimed our Kashmir as legally our own, let us accept that whatever Pakistan has, the POK, belongs to that country, and Aksai Chin be China’s. We are still the winners with 45% of the pie, while others have 35 and 20% respectively. But if we continue like Amit Shah claiming the whole, tell me, WHICH COUNTRY will allow it? Worse than that, we might end up shedding untold amount of our own people’s blood (Kashmiris’). We are very close to the final solution of this problem, or have jumped right in the middle of a quagmire. But one thing is certain, we are closer to international or UN intervention than we ever were. No amount of foolish patriotism can wish them away.
All international treaties become a part of the constitution either directly or through enabling legislation when they are signed. So, if any nation decides to do some kind of confiscate and nationalize program they will be most likely be in violation of their own laws. Nations of course can and have changed such laws to nationalize companies especially oil or other important commodities where the suppliers hold an upper hand over the market. No one can do anything about nations changing their laws, but yeah locking up diplomats can be a reason to declare war. Of course any such abrupt decision would lead to a flight .of capital and make it nearly impossible to bring in fdi and maybe even lose trading status with other countries.
In this case the point is that the constitutional changes do not violate any international treaty commitments by India.
Really surprised to see still there are some people in India who unknowingly act as dumb as radicalized creature, just to satisfy their own ego on MODI enemity and end up showing India in a bad light in front of the world. Brush up your sense of logic and knowledge before commenting on anything and everything. You are comparing between a plane(MOVABLE OBJECT) which has flown in from another continent overnight and Kashmir which is historically a part of BHARAT and used to be controlled by HINDU kings for GENERATIONS.
Some time I feel terrorist are better then you as we can find them out or distinguish them but people like you stay and poisoning our society and hide behind a mask so that it is very difficult to recognize. Shame on you….
Nothing much will happen in that line, but Mr.Sanjiv Bhatia sounds stupid. Frankly speaking, I am not a Modi fan but what you wrote doesn’t make any sense. For your information, I lived in Kashmir for few years with Kashmiris and I seriously feel Congress should have done this change 30 years back and many problems what is currently happening could have finished long back. I am serious.
Simon, this has happened many times before, so I must correct it. (I will not become any less an idiot by doing so, haha) My surname is BhatLa, and not Bhatia.
Jeremy Corbyn is an idiot. As long as he is there at the helm, labour will never win. India should throw the question back at him on his views on Jews.
Sir,
It is BRITISHERS who ERUPTED INDO PAK PROBLEMS WAY BACK IN1909 by MORLEAY-MINTO REFORMS . After Recognising this Mistake , Montwgue – Chelmsford Reforms failed to Rectify This Mistake in 1919 and Ended with The PARTITION OF INDIA IN 1947.
For the last 72 years The HATE MONGERING PAKISTANIS ARE CREATING UNWANTED INHUMAN PROBLEMS IN KASHMIR .
In 1971 PAKISTAN was on it’s kneels after loosing The War, Smt Indira Gandhi Failed To SOLVE KASHMIR ISSUE FOR EVER Then.
Now , Our Beloved PM NARENDRAMODI has Taken Steps To SOLVE KASHMIRIS PROBLEMS . IT IS OUR PRIME DUTY TO SUPPORT HIM IN THE DEVLOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES.
PAKISTAN PM Sri .Imran Khan in his speech on 14/08/2019 has accepted that HINDUSTAN/ INDIA ATTACKED BALAKOTE IN RETALIATION TO PULWAMA TERRORIST ACT. That Means, NOW PAKISTANIS KNOW THAT INDIA WILL NOT SPARE THEM FOR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES AND PUNISH THEM IN A BEFITTING MANNER WITHOUT SPARING THEM FOR EVER.
EVERY ACTION DONE FOR OUR BETTERMENT IN OUR MOTHER LAND IS AN INTERNAL MATTER . HENCE NOBODY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO POKE THEIR NOSE IN OUR INTERNAL AFFAIRS.
With best wishes for betterment,
Yours truly,
Shiva Kumar.T.N.
These intellectual terrorists are working against India and spreading bad comments wherever they are. No other religion people will not comment or behave madly..At least one man Modiji came and doing something for this country. Let’s wait and give him some space. Idiots will not give any solutions but criticise like eunochs. Britishers actually created this problem and in coming 10 years surely so many separist movements on religious griunds will happen in UK
,,,,, this is reality they will face it..
Kashmiris will be benefited with removal of 370 move and pls understand situation of new youth in Kashmir and keep away them to go into wrong path and pain day to day all Kashmiris were suffering..
What was a temporary provision in the Indian constitution removed altogether. Why Britain and it’s party is taking aggressive stance on it. And this nation is notorious for it’s racial stand and inhuman activities. The pages of history not yet effaced British colonial period era on this subcontinent.
Actually India had taught the world that every thing is fair to get votes in elections. This is what
happened in usa and labour in England is trying to copy the same. Modified version of divide and rule given by us is being accepted now everywhere in the power game
I don’t feel comfortable with this line, “… Constitutional changes are India’s internal matter… “. It does not quite sound complete, but I am unable to think up a convincing argument. Are ALL constitutional changes a country’s internal matter? Let me try this:
Suppose at a given time there are aeroplanes from the USA, UK, Zimbabwe, Croatia and a few other countries parked at different Indian airports for refueling. Suddenly Narendra Modi passes a rule that, “all aeroplanes on Indian territory are India’s property”, and simultaneously he locks up the ambassadors and other staff of these countries’ embassies. What happens then?
These are not constitutional changes but government hostile actions.
Sanjiv, what you conveniently ignored while comparing a constitutional amendment, or any legislative action by duly elected representative and a decision to seize property and assets of foreign countries that both are two separate instances. What you do internally and what you do externally are totally different. Seizing assets of other countries is an infringement of diplomatic decisions, which are never taken without mutual discussion. You SHOULD know that airplanes of other countries come for landing/refilling ONLY if Govt of India has already approved it. You can not abrogate such decisions as it is tantamount to not respecting the sovereign integrity of that nation. It is a direct breach of international conventions and that country would be justified in resorting to military action. They then would have full right to seize Indian assets abroad.
What food you eat in your house is your prerogative, what you do outside your house would, whether in public place or someone’s house would invite others to take against against you.
Hope you would have understood, and you don’t try this.
Anil, thanks for a calm and reasoned rejection of what I wrote, instead of something like Pallab Das’ impatient rejection, calling me a terrorist. Actually I too wasn’t convinced about the example I gave, but it sounded funny so I let it go. Let us not be very serious all the time.
This subject of Kashmir has been hot for quite some time. 370 has happened only now. I remember that I have commented many times right here, on THE PRINT, that we were close to internationalization of this subject. Pakistan always wanted it, Narendra Modi has leant them a helping hand by this decision. My simple question is this : If it was India’s internal matter, and so desirable from India’s standpoint, then why was this decision not taken in the entire 70 years? Including 6 of Atal ji’s government.
You know, Modi has in fact made the FINAL solution of the Kashmir problem EXTREMELY EASY. I may again be called a terrorist by P Das. Let this be the final division of the Kashmir pie – – now that India has claimed our Kashmir as legally our own, let us accept that whatever Pakistan has, the POK, belongs to that country, and Aksai Chin be China’s. We are still the winners with 45% of the pie, while others have 35 and 20% respectively. But if we continue like Amit Shah claiming the whole, tell me, WHICH COUNTRY will allow it? Worse than that, we might end up shedding untold amount of our own people’s blood (Kashmiris’). We are very close to the final solution of this problem, or have jumped right in the middle of a quagmire. But one thing is certain, we are closer to international or UN intervention than we ever were. No amount of foolish patriotism can wish them away.
All international treaties become a part of the constitution either directly or through enabling legislation when they are signed. So, if any nation decides to do some kind of confiscate and nationalize program they will be most likely be in violation of their own laws. Nations of course can and have changed such laws to nationalize companies especially oil or other important commodities where the suppliers hold an upper hand over the market. No one can do anything about nations changing their laws, but yeah locking up diplomats can be a reason to declare war. Of course any such abrupt decision would lead to a flight .of capital and make it nearly impossible to bring in fdi and maybe even lose trading status with other countries.
In this case the point is that the constitutional changes do not violate any international treaty commitments by India.
Really surprised to see still there are some people in India who unknowingly act as dumb as radicalized creature, just to satisfy their own ego on MODI enemity and end up showing India in a bad light in front of the world. Brush up your sense of logic and knowledge before commenting on anything and everything. You are comparing between a plane(MOVABLE OBJECT) which has flown in from another continent overnight and Kashmir which is historically a part of BHARAT and used to be controlled by HINDU kings for GENERATIONS.
Some time I feel terrorist are better then you as we can find them out or distinguish them but people like you stay and poisoning our society and hide behind a mask so that it is very difficult to recognize. Shame on you….
Nothing much will happen in that line, but Mr.Sanjiv Bhatia sounds stupid. Frankly speaking, I am not a Modi fan but what you wrote doesn’t make any sense. For your information, I lived in Kashmir for few years with Kashmiris and I seriously feel Congress should have done this change 30 years back and many problems what is currently happening could have finished long back. I am serious.
Simon, this has happened many times before, so I must correct it. (I will not become any less an idiot by doing so, haha) My surname is BhatLa, and not Bhatia.
For everyone to know his nutty leadership works: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/08/04/jeremy-corbyns-leadership-has-radicalised-labour-members-attacking/amp/
Jeremy Corbyn is an idiot. As long as he is there at the helm, labour will never win. India should throw the question back at him on his views on Jews.