Judges insist that the terrible ADM Jabalpur judgment has been 'buried ten fathoms deep', but Supreme Court's actions during lockdown suggest its spirit is still strong.
As concerns were raised over changes in labour laws in various states, Kumar said the central government was committed to protecting the interests of workers.
A round-up of the most important reports in major newspapers around the country – from TOI and HT, Express and The Hindu to The Telegraph, Mumbai Mirror and The Tribune, as well as top financial dailies.
Writing in the Economic Times, the founder of software services provider Wipro said that dilution of such laws would only exacerbate the conditions of low wage workers.
Yogi Adityanath govt will hold an online exhibition in June that will promote local goods such as Bhadohi carpets, Lucknow chikan work, Banarasi sarees.
As with the number of cases, most people seem to be underestimating the economic impact of Covid-19, such as forecasters fiddling with positive growth numbers.
The PIL filed Thursday challenged Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh’s govt in allowing industrial units to increase working hours & deny worker rights.
The BMS also said migrant workers' problems have aggravated during the lockdown mainly because there is 'gross violation' of laws by most of the states.
We fail to understand what Adityanath will get by this policy. A 3-year window of regulatory concessions add up to nothing for any new and serious investor.
While releasing 'India Employment Report 2024', V Anantha Nageswaran said govt can't solve 'all social, economic challenges'. Congress leader Kharge says CEA protecting 'dear leader'.
In an interview with Gulistan News this week, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said the government would leave law and order to J&K Police and slowly withdraw troops.
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
It’s better for all online ‘Newspapers’ to have its comment section closed for good.
Every online newspaper article I have read has its comment section filled with hatred and sometimes name calling of the journalists too.
There’s a difference between criticism and verbal abuse.
Why should the SC have a class bias, the selection process is constitutionally perfect so the Sc has said. Why should it takes whatever the govt says at face value? It is independent so the Sc has said.
We must believe this because we should not speak against the SC.
It is an institution that does not shy away from hearing and giving a ruling on everything.
A week self-serving and corrupt executive has over the decades spread those qualities to all other pillars of the society, with a host of peripheral beneficiaries supporting the echo-system
Activists forget that accountability of Government is with Parliament and with Elections in which the Government cac be voted out.Courts are there to interpret the laws not foor judicial activism, they are not to replace the Govt. These Elite lawyers are all upper class and want users the system which they did not get because they were rejected by the people
Administration of resouces is complex, even more complex is living human populations. No laws can apply in epidemic, massive migration, providing food, water, medical needs.
Professionals cannot walk with sick, wounded, on cycle, trucks, trains, buses and on foot from Mumbai to any place on India.
All resources were judiciously used within limits of availability.
Well judges are also human beings and under current dispensation the establishment can harm them or their dear relatives. The government can get away with it too. Justice loya case is still in public memory.
So what do we do ? Nothing count your blessings. After all people do live and procreate in banana republics.
Class bias would be too superficial a view. It is true that most apex court judges come from privileged backgrounds. Many of them could have earned a fortune in private practice. However, the recent loss of autonomy of thought and action cannot be explained in these terms. It is as if the Court is distancing itself from some of its most basic duties towards Indian citizens. This is a very troubling phase in the life of this grand institution. We can only pray that it is transient.
It’s better for all online ‘Newspapers’ to have its comment section closed for good.
Every online newspaper article I have read has its comment section filled with hatred and sometimes name calling of the journalists too.
There’s a difference between criticism and verbal abuse.
Why should the SC have a class bias, the selection process is constitutionally perfect so the Sc has said. Why should it takes whatever the govt says at face value? It is independent so the Sc has said.
We must believe this because we should not speak against the SC.
It is an institution that does not shy away from hearing and giving a ruling on everything.
A week self-serving and corrupt executive has over the decades spread those qualities to all other pillars of the society, with a host of peripheral beneficiaries supporting the echo-system
Activists forget that accountability of Government is with Parliament and with Elections in which the Government cac be voted out.Courts are there to interpret the laws not foor judicial activism, they are not to replace the Govt. These Elite lawyers are all upper class and want users the system which they did not get because they were rejected by the people
What is so surprising in that ?
Administration of resouces is complex, even more complex is living human populations. No laws can apply in epidemic, massive migration, providing food, water, medical needs.
Professionals cannot walk with sick, wounded, on cycle, trucks, trains, buses and on foot from Mumbai to any place on India.
All resources were judiciously used within limits of availability.
Well judges are also human beings and under current dispensation the establishment can harm them or their dear relatives. The government can get away with it too. Justice loya case is still in public memory.
So what do we do ? Nothing count your blessings. After all people do live and procreate in banana republics.
Class bias would be too superficial a view. It is true that most apex court judges come from privileged backgrounds. Many of them could have earned a fortune in private practice. However, the recent loss of autonomy of thought and action cannot be explained in these terms. It is as if the Court is distancing itself from some of its most basic duties towards Indian citizens. This is a very troubling phase in the life of this grand institution. We can only pray that it is transient.