Mahmood Madani’s presence as a visible Muslim alim justifies the misleading perception that all Muslims are deeply religious, and that he represents their views.
Idea of Kashmiriyat rested on asserting Kashmir’s uniqueness, and emerged out of Kashmiri nationalism’s close relationship to Indian nationalism in early 20th century.
External affairs minister S. Jaishankar, who met his American counterpart Mike Pompeo, said he clarified that discussions on Kashmir would only be through bilateral talks with Pakistan.
Here's what is happening across the border: Austerity drive fails to reduce Prez Arif Alvi’s security cars and most non-resident Pakistanis are blue-collar workers and cannot contribute to dam collection.
Peter Manuel's ‘Cassette Culture’ showed the booming Bhakti music during the '80s and '90s when Anoop Jalota, Gulshan Kumar achieved success by singing the sanitised Bhajans.
Economists say there are weaknesses in India’s GDP data. But statisticians claim the accusations are based on flawed understanding, saying while GDP has problems, the economists are looking in the wrong places.
The kind of narrative you want and expected from others is not coming from this gentleman so best way is undermine him and show him as a stooge. Good effort but no longer works.
So far I have seen Maulaba Mahmood Madanu,a move in last few decades, he has proved himself a person of no honest and trustworthy stand.
Sorry to say but its fact that he is no religious leader of Muslim community rather he acts as a politician, thus is where he has always been confused and such confused behaviour has made him ineffective.
On the other hand, I think muslims in India, need a Muslim political leader for their well being and not a cleric as a political leader. There certain major socio-political issues among Indian public which can be understood in totality and not in aloofness reason being our most of population is secular except a very small percentage are communal. India can’t go well without its honest secular fabric and sooner or later, every class and community will understand the need of its secular need and will demolish the walls of all communal and social divisive politics of all sides.
Politics should not mixed with religions since it can never be good for masses.
India is not a Hindu country, repeat twenty times till it sinks in.
Muslims have a right to be here, just like Hindu citizens.
Citizenship of India is not decided on the basis of religion, as India is not a Hindu country all religions are equal.
If some Hindus consider that India is a Hindu country, they rob the rights of Muslims.
The 170 million Muslims, if their equal rights are stolen, will resist with all their might.
Do we really want a second partition of India.
The abomination which is communal politics must be resisted by all sane Indians.
The madness of 1947 is visiting India again brought back by the same organisation.
Why? If Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, etc. can be Muslim countries, and USA, UK, Australia, etc. can be Christian countries, why can’t India be a Hindu country? Christian and Hindu countries typically have equal rights for their citizens to practice their religion, which is not true about Muslim countries. Why is that so? Don’t dare talk about another partition. If you really wanted to be in a Muslim country, you (your parents, or grand parents) had the option to migrate to Pakistan.
BTW, India being a Hindu nation is more a cultural identity; people practicing other religions are welcome and are actually embraced. In fact, other religions (Sikhs, Parsi’s, Jews, etc.) have no trouble living harmoniously, so why is it that only Muslims are having issues? Perhaps time for you to introspect.
सियासी मुसलमान। हिलाल अहमद राजनैतिक इस्लाम।
अच्छा लेख लिखा है अपनी तरफ से पर असली मुद्दे से भटक गये ।
सबसे पहले राजनैतिक इस्लाम। इस पर टिप्पणी से शायद काफी पाठकों को अच्छा नहीं लगेगा। इसलिए केवल एक सच लिखा रहा हूं;। दुनिया की हर सभ्यता में राजनीति और धर्म हर स्तर पर रहे , दोनों ही ने एक दूसरे का पालन-पोषण किया, कुछ अच्छा हुआ होगा पर अधिकतर बुरा ही हुआ।
आज भी संसार में अशांति का मुख्य कारण मज़हब और सियासत के ठेकेदारों के अपने अपने स्वार्थ है
सारी बीमारियो की जड़ फोकट की चौधराहट है, जिस पर गौर से देखने पर पता लगता है,कि जिसे देखिये वहीं मुस्लिम समुदाय का रहनुमा और बड़ा लीडर बना बैठा है । पुराने समय मैं चौधरी साहब दस बीस लठेतौ से घिरे हर मामले और फटे में टांग अड़ाने से बाज नहीं आते थे ,हर मुकदमे की दलाली पर दोनों तरफ से मलाई खाते ।यही हाल आज के इन नये मजहबी ठेकेदारों और सेल्फ स्टाइल चौधरीयो का है। बीस पच्चीस गाड़ियों का काफिला ,तीस चालीस हथियार बंद (लीगल इल्लीगल) बाउंसर ,जगह जगह भड़काऊ राजनैतिक तकरीर ,।हम है,,, के ,,दम पर राजनैतिक उलटफेर के दावे ।
कसर किसी राज्य में नहीं है, बंगाल में लाल बत्ती वाले इमाम,यूं पी में,, ज उ हिन्द ,,ए,,असरफ,,,,एम,,, महमूद दोनों ही मदनी, दिल्ली में , जामा मस्जिद के बुखारी और उनके दामाद, फतहपुरी मस्जिद के इमाम ,और बड़ी लम्बी लिस्ट है खास और आम मजहबी चौधरी साहबान की । मसला ज्यादातर लोक सभा या राज्यसभा के सांसद,नहीं तो एम एल ए वगैराह वगैराह।
देश का समाज हिन्दू मुसलमान सिक्ख ईसाई दलित आदिवासी और न जाने कितने हिस्से में बांट डाला है इन सेल्फ स्टाइल सियायी और मजहबी ठेकेदारों ने।आज की माग इन सब से उपर उठ कर केवल और केवल भारतीय बनने और बनाने की है ।अगर समझ आयेगा तो।
In my view, generally, Hindus if they would like to come to India, we should have a policy of accepting them and providing permanent resident status as this being origin of Hindus, Buddists, Sikhs and Jains who are native to this region. On there other faith holders, can decide whether they want to live. They are free to live in India, if they agree to follow Indian constitutions and Indian laws and have legally entered this country. Anyone illegally entering this country should be deported to their respective countries. For example, if Hindus, Sikhs, Jains or Buddists, who have problems in Pakistan and would like to settle in India, there should be policy of providing them permanent resident status. However, they need to enter legally. There is nothing wrong is identifying illegal foreigners and deporting them back. I have seen that most of the muslims in India would like stay in India and be part of main stream. However, few radicals wanted their rights to practice their own laws, which should not be allowed. Nehru tried is pseudo secularism, which lead to only appeasement politics and it failed miserably.
For all practical social purposes the Hindu religion is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of ‘Hinduism as a religion – denying it is a bunch of beliefs, within a social structure called caste has created an enormous amount of human and social damage.
India has a myriad of religious beliefs, classified by outsiders as Hinduism.
In recent years it has taken a heavy toll in human lives and caused untold suffering. It still prevents the normal development of millions of human beings and deprives Indian of the effective co-operation of productive minds.
This has happened because the Indian government in successive years has misspent and squandered the nations wealth, and has not put enough emphasis on education of its population.
Hindutva is a peculiar manifestation of fascism and has nothing to do with religious belief.
For a long time, Indian Muslims were not too deeply troubled by events in Kashmir. So long as the xenophobia in the north east was directed against all foreigners / outsiders, perhaps Assam too may not have bothered them. However, that is bound to change. The CAB has altered the discourse on deporting people of one religious persuasion alone. With incidents of hate crime in several parts of the country and a growing sense of insecurity, Kashmir would also be seen in a different light. A harmonious outreach to Muslims would be an act of statesmanship.
“With incidents of hate crime in several parts of the country and a growing sense of insecurity,”
Stop the FUD. The growing sense of insecurity is a propaganda by the Left and Congress. Conflict between Hindus and Muslims have always existed and it is not increasing as you propagandists make out to be.
“A harmonious outreach to Muslims would be an act of statesmanship.”
Why should anyone reach out to Muslims specifically? How are they special? I have always thought the idea of secularism was to treat everyone equally irrespective of the religion they practice, when did that change to Muslim appeasement?
The kind of narrative you want and expected from others is not coming from this gentleman so best way is undermine him and show him as a stooge. Good effort but no longer works.
So far I have seen Maulaba Mahmood Madanu,a move in last few decades, he has proved himself a person of no honest and trustworthy stand.
Sorry to say but its fact that he is no religious leader of Muslim community rather he acts as a politician, thus is where he has always been confused and such confused behaviour has made him ineffective.
On the other hand, I think muslims in India, need a Muslim political leader for their well being and not a cleric as a political leader. There certain major socio-political issues among Indian public which can be understood in totality and not in aloofness reason being our most of population is secular except a very small percentage are communal. India can’t go well without its honest secular fabric and sooner or later, every class and community will understand the need of its secular need and will demolish the walls of all communal and social divisive politics of all sides.
Politics should not mixed with religions since it can never be good for masses.
India is not a Hindu country, repeat twenty times till it sinks in.
Muslims have a right to be here, just like Hindu citizens.
Citizenship of India is not decided on the basis of religion, as India is not a Hindu country all religions are equal.
If some Hindus consider that India is a Hindu country, they rob the rights of Muslims.
The 170 million Muslims, if their equal rights are stolen, will resist with all their might.
Do we really want a second partition of India.
The abomination which is communal politics must be resisted by all sane Indians.
The madness of 1947 is visiting India again brought back by the same organisation.
Why? If Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, etc. can be Muslim countries, and USA, UK, Australia, etc. can be Christian countries, why can’t India be a Hindu country? Christian and Hindu countries typically have equal rights for their citizens to practice their religion, which is not true about Muslim countries. Why is that so? Don’t dare talk about another partition. If you really wanted to be in a Muslim country, you (your parents, or grand parents) had the option to migrate to Pakistan.
BTW, India being a Hindu nation is more a cultural identity; people practicing other religions are welcome and are actually embraced. In fact, other religions (Sikhs, Parsi’s, Jews, etc.) have no trouble living harmoniously, so why is it that only Muslims are having issues? Perhaps time for you to introspect.
सियासी मुसलमान। हिलाल अहमद राजनैतिक इस्लाम।
अच्छा लेख लिखा है अपनी तरफ से पर असली मुद्दे से भटक गये ।
सबसे पहले राजनैतिक इस्लाम। इस पर टिप्पणी से शायद काफी पाठकों को अच्छा नहीं लगेगा। इसलिए केवल एक सच लिखा रहा हूं;। दुनिया की हर सभ्यता में राजनीति और धर्म हर स्तर पर रहे , दोनों ही ने एक दूसरे का पालन-पोषण किया, कुछ अच्छा हुआ होगा पर अधिकतर बुरा ही हुआ।
आज भी संसार में अशांति का मुख्य कारण मज़हब और सियासत के ठेकेदारों के अपने अपने स्वार्थ है
सारी बीमारियो की जड़ फोकट की चौधराहट है, जिस पर गौर से देखने पर पता लगता है,कि जिसे देखिये वहीं मुस्लिम समुदाय का रहनुमा और बड़ा लीडर बना बैठा है । पुराने समय मैं चौधरी साहब दस बीस लठेतौ से घिरे हर मामले और फटे में टांग अड़ाने से बाज नहीं आते थे ,हर मुकदमे की दलाली पर दोनों तरफ से मलाई खाते ।यही हाल आज के इन नये मजहबी ठेकेदारों और सेल्फ स्टाइल चौधरीयो का है। बीस पच्चीस गाड़ियों का काफिला ,तीस चालीस हथियार बंद (लीगल इल्लीगल) बाउंसर ,जगह जगह भड़काऊ राजनैतिक तकरीर ,।हम है,,, के ,,दम पर राजनैतिक उलटफेर के दावे ।
कसर किसी राज्य में नहीं है, बंगाल में लाल बत्ती वाले इमाम,यूं पी में,, ज उ हिन्द ,,ए,,असरफ,,,,एम,,, महमूद दोनों ही मदनी, दिल्ली में , जामा मस्जिद के बुखारी और उनके दामाद, फतहपुरी मस्जिद के इमाम ,और बड़ी लम्बी लिस्ट है खास और आम मजहबी चौधरी साहबान की । मसला ज्यादातर लोक सभा या राज्यसभा के सांसद,नहीं तो एम एल ए वगैराह वगैराह।
देश का समाज हिन्दू मुसलमान सिक्ख ईसाई दलित आदिवासी और न जाने कितने हिस्से में बांट डाला है इन सेल्फ स्टाइल सियायी और मजहबी ठेकेदारों ने।आज की माग इन सब से उपर उठ कर केवल और केवल भारतीय बनने और बनाने की है ।अगर समझ आयेगा तो।
In my view, generally, Hindus if they would like to come to India, we should have a policy of accepting them and providing permanent resident status as this being origin of Hindus, Buddists, Sikhs and Jains who are native to this region. On there other faith holders, can decide whether they want to live. They are free to live in India, if they agree to follow Indian constitutions and Indian laws and have legally entered this country. Anyone illegally entering this country should be deported to their respective countries. For example, if Hindus, Sikhs, Jains or Buddists, who have problems in Pakistan and would like to settle in India, there should be policy of providing them permanent resident status. However, they need to enter legally. There is nothing wrong is identifying illegal foreigners and deporting them back. I have seen that most of the muslims in India would like stay in India and be part of main stream. However, few radicals wanted their rights to practice their own laws, which should not be allowed. Nehru tried is pseudo secularism, which lead to only appeasement politics and it failed miserably.
For all practical social purposes the Hindu religion is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of ‘Hinduism as a religion – denying it is a bunch of beliefs, within a social structure called caste has created an enormous amount of human and social damage.
India has a myriad of religious beliefs, classified by outsiders as Hinduism.
In recent years it has taken a heavy toll in human lives and caused untold suffering. It still prevents the normal development of millions of human beings and deprives Indian of the effective co-operation of productive minds.
This has happened because the Indian government in successive years has misspent and squandered the nations wealth, and has not put enough emphasis on education of its population.
Hindutva is a peculiar manifestation of fascism and has nothing to do with religious belief.
For a long time, Indian Muslims were not too deeply troubled by events in Kashmir. So long as the xenophobia in the north east was directed against all foreigners / outsiders, perhaps Assam too may not have bothered them. However, that is bound to change. The CAB has altered the discourse on deporting people of one religious persuasion alone. With incidents of hate crime in several parts of the country and a growing sense of insecurity, Kashmir would also be seen in a different light. A harmonious outreach to Muslims would be an act of statesmanship.
“With incidents of hate crime in several parts of the country and a growing sense of insecurity,”
Stop the FUD. The growing sense of insecurity is a propaganda by the Left and Congress. Conflict between Hindus and Muslims have always existed and it is not increasing as you propagandists make out to be.
“A harmonious outreach to Muslims would be an act of statesmanship.”
Why should anyone reach out to Muslims specifically? How are they special? I have always thought the idea of secularism was to treat everyone equally irrespective of the religion they practice, when did that change to Muslim appeasement?