The Justice DY Chandrachud led 3-judge bench posed the query to advocate Shadan Farasat when he argued in favour of a permanent injunction against the Sudarshan News show.
Jamia UPSC centre is one of five facilities set up by govt between 2009 and 2010 to provide underprivileged communities with free residential coaching for the civil services.
Architect S.M. Akhtar tells ThePrint 5-acre mosque complex will also have hospital, research centre & museum. He will design all these buildings, ensuring they have 'coordination between them'.
Titled 'Delhi Riots: Conspiracy Unravelled', the 150-page book alleges that ‘radical’ Islamic groups instigated the riots. It’s set for release in early September.
The report is based on a fact-finding mission conducted by National Federation of Indian Women which gathered testimonies from the injured and doctors & nurses who treated them.
Ranked 10th in the National Institutional Ranking Framework's 2020 listing, this is a major jump for the university which had not made it to the top 10 in the last five years.
Delhi Police also said it was not a sporadic incident as the ‘rioters’ were armed with stones, lathis, petrol bombs, which manifest the intention of the mob.
Israel's response to Iran's retaliatory attack was relatively small and also downplayed by Tehran. But there are factors that could jeopardise this perceived reprieve.
The 125 APAs include 86 Unilateral APAs (UAPAs) and 39 Bilateral APAs (BAPAs). The total number of APAs since the start of the APA programme has risen to 641, with 506 UAPAs and 135 BAPAs.
One cannot arbitrarily impose rules and restrictions including the honourable Supreme Court. The point raised by Sudarsadhan TV about “Hindu Terror”/”Saffron Terror” is a valid one. Either Supreme Court should use this opportunity to objectively delineate what constitutes “hate speech” or should just shut up.
I may not agree with their presentation style, but that does not necessarily imply their thesis is wrong. Sudarshan TV should be given a chance to back up their story with hard statistical numbers, if they have them. In general, its a much better idea to impose penalty on the news channels if they cannot substantiate a news item, rather than trying to go around looking whose sentiment got hurt!!
Criticism of RSS, BJP, Hindutva is not hate speech. Criticism of congress, moghuls jihad is hate speech. Did any of our media take up the cause of displaced kashmiri pundits?
The congressi media, including print, criticizes RSS, BJP Hindutva. Does it not amount to hate speech against Hindus? Did you ever take up the cause do kashmiri pundits? Open your eyes and remember why Sikhism was born in Punjab.
Investigation by CBI on higher average marks in interview for muslims, NIA on why urdu is chosen language by Muslim applicants and links of examiners, ED for funding source of Zakat and it’s spending and Personel department to scrutinize decisions taken by such bureaucrats.
Instead of commenting on FORM , those who have objection must counter based on SUBSTANCE of the program.
If you have facts , rebut each claim of Program by counter facts……
What the hell has happened to nations judiciary.. some news channel(sudarshan) runs a Show for gaining TRP on name of UPSC defaming it as “UPSC JIHAD” . I would like to ask Supreme Court of India is India really a secular state now ??? The most prestigious exam UPSC-CSE is questioned on basis of religion naming it as Jihad. Can’t judges see that how that reporter or the host was targeting a community and questioning why muslims are increasing in UPSC , has supreme court not been able to see this??? Respected SC of India we are a part of secular nation and we believe in social+ communal unity .so many people are trying to disturb it and it’s clearly in front of you..so judges please be ethical to the institution. People in nation has begun to say that “kanun bik gaya hai BJP ke hatho” ..don’t let this happen more.
Creativity is the base of Indian culture,In every era India is glorified through great personalities in various field above cast and creed, the art sculpture of North and south india are examples of Indian creativity but after Britishers left india with division of religion today we are using same formula in politics
For a documentary which would have readily attracted Section 153 (a) of IPC in an alternative world, the Supreme Court of India this great democracy is posing a question “if stop airing the show not amount to scuttling freedom of speech”… GREAT MY LORD
Freedom of speech does not mean you can say anything period. If movies have a censorship then Broadcasters all have to have a code. Supreme court cannot shy away from responsibility.
Punishing a murderer is not wrong
Protecting a poor by punishing a murderer won’t harm one.
If SC doesn’t stop this, then other side can produce similar content.
So judges should call a bull a bull and stop this nonsense
The honourable judges say that “the fact that you paint the entire community with the same brush is a problem”. But then ask if we can classify it as hate speech. I thought classifying the whole community with the same brush and blaming the whole community to be terrorists over superfluous accusations was already defined as hate speech.
One cannot arbitrarily impose rules and restrictions including the honourable Supreme Court. The point raised by Sudarsadhan TV about “Hindu Terror”/”Saffron Terror” is a valid one. Either Supreme Court should use this opportunity to objectively delineate what constitutes “hate speech” or should just shut up.
I may not agree with their presentation style, but that does not necessarily imply their thesis is wrong. Sudarshan TV should be given a chance to back up their story with hard statistical numbers, if they have them. In general, its a much better idea to impose penalty on the news channels if they cannot substantiate a news item, rather than trying to go around looking whose sentiment got hurt!!
My message failed. That is the level of free speech you allow and beg for funds
Criticism of RSS, BJP, Hindutva is not hate speech. Criticism of congress, moghuls jihad is hate speech. Did any of our media take up the cause of displaced kashmiri pundits?
The congressi media, including print, criticizes RSS, BJP Hindutva. Does it not amount to hate speech against Hindus? Did you ever take up the cause do kashmiri pundits? Open your eyes and remember why Sikhism was born in Punjab.
Investigation by CBI on higher average marks in interview for muslims, NIA on why urdu is chosen language by Muslim applicants and links of examiners, ED for funding source of Zakat and it’s spending and Personel department to scrutinize decisions taken by such bureaucrats.
Instead of commenting on FORM , those who have objection must counter based on SUBSTANCE of the program.
If you have facts , rebut each claim of Program by counter facts……
What the hell has happened to nations judiciary.. some news channel(sudarshan) runs a Show for gaining TRP on name of UPSC defaming it as “UPSC JIHAD” . I would like to ask Supreme Court of India is India really a secular state now ??? The most prestigious exam UPSC-CSE is questioned on basis of religion naming it as Jihad. Can’t judges see that how that reporter or the host was targeting a community and questioning why muslims are increasing in UPSC , has supreme court not been able to see this??? Respected SC of India we are a part of secular nation and we believe in social+ communal unity .so many people are trying to disturb it and it’s clearly in front of you..so judges please be ethical to the institution. People in nation has begun to say that “kanun bik gaya hai BJP ke hatho” ..don’t let this happen more.
Creativity is the base of Indian culture,In every era India is glorified through great personalities in various field above cast and creed, the art sculpture of North and south india are examples of Indian creativity but after Britishers left india with division of religion today we are using same formula in politics
For a documentary which would have readily attracted Section 153 (a) of IPC in an alternative world, the Supreme Court of India this great democracy is posing a question “if stop airing the show not amount to scuttling freedom of speech”… GREAT MY LORD
Freedom of speech does not mean you can say anything period. If movies have a censorship then Broadcasters all have to have a code. Supreme court cannot shy away from responsibility.
Punishing a murderer is not wrong
Protecting a poor by punishing a murderer won’t harm one.
If SC doesn’t stop this, then other side can produce similar content.
So judges should call a bull a bull and stop this nonsense
Already religious book in one hand and constitution in another hand is being taken a new heights by journalist indulging in fake propaganda.
Please ask what would they would implement if in majority ..
The constitution is a stop gap arrangement.
The honourable judges say that “the fact that you paint the entire community with the same brush is a problem”. But then ask if we can classify it as hate speech. I thought classifying the whole community with the same brush and blaming the whole community to be terrorists over superfluous accusations was already defined as hate speech.