Trolls are maligning my murdered husband, says Amrutha, pleads for hurtful comments to stop.
Miryalaguda: The family of a Telangana Dalit man, killed at the behest...
B. Sandeep and Madhavi Chari were attacked over caste differences by her father. Even as Madhavi fights for her life, Sandeep says nothing will happen to her.
The seeds were sown in Gujarat, and the current attack on activists over the Elgaar Parishad event only shows their nervousness.
This abhorrent phrase ‘Urban...
The reach and impact of influencers are so significant that even politicians such as Prime Minister Narendra Modi have recognised their value—the National Creators Award is proof.
Economists say there are weaknesses in India’s GDP data. But statisticians claim the accusations are based on flawed understanding, saying while GDP has problems, the economists are looking in the wrong places.
Both the governments expressed their commitment to strengthening their maritime cooperation to strengthen the maritime safety and security framework in the region.
I have studied many things but if texts are produced from a certain prejudiced perspective then what’s the point of engagement & change ? Provocation may help one to start a conversation but actual conversation needs to happen beyond a certain point. I have never seen him ever engaging seriously even though i have studied a lot of his articles & has seen him on various Audio-Visual platforms discussing the Dalit issue.
Should only upper caste study the history or Dalits & other oppressed classes are willing to engage with historical narratives in honest manners ? Are they willing to look beyond privilege-oppressed identities to the system which creates these identities ? Will they only remain critical of identities while allowing the system that perpetuates these identities to remain intact or will they look beyond identities to the system itself ?
The system of oppression from their perspective is religious but never political or economical whereas religions appropriate the social behavior to gain the numbers so then the question arises ‘whose system is it to oppress’ – All religions all over the world appropriated what was already prevalent in the society or the society which was divided even before the religious umbrella created a single religious denominational identity ?
I can keep discussing Caste from various point of views & according to me the only texts which should be allowed in history are ones which provide the most accurate portrayal of history in factual numbers, incidents, manuscripts, inscription but leaving the judgment to interpret them on each individual.
Students shouldn’t waste time reading kancha’s trash
I have studied many things but if texts are produced from a certain prejudiced perspective then what’s the point of engagement & change ? Provocation may help one to start a conversation but actual conversation needs to happen beyond a certain point. I have never seen him ever engaging seriously even though i have studied a lot of his articles & has seen him on various Audio-Visual platforms discussing the Dalit issue.
Should only upper caste study the history or Dalits & other oppressed classes are willing to engage with historical narratives in honest manners ? Are they willing to look beyond privilege-oppressed identities to the system which creates these identities ? Will they only remain critical of identities while allowing the system that perpetuates these identities to remain intact or will they look beyond identities to the system itself ?
The system of oppression from their perspective is religious but never political or economical whereas religions appropriate the social behavior to gain the numbers so then the question arises ‘whose system is it to oppress’ – All religions all over the world appropriated what was already prevalent in the society or the society which was divided even before the religious umbrella created a single religious denominational identity ?
I can keep discussing Caste from various point of views & according to me the only texts which should be allowed in history are ones which provide the most accurate portrayal of history in factual numbers, incidents, manuscripts, inscription but leaving the judgment to interpret them on each individual.