Law minister’s letter comes in the wake of Justice Chelameswar’s stinging 5-page letter to CJI on delay in appointment of Karnataka district judge Krishna Bhat.
Vikas Singh, also president of the Supreme Court Bar Association, rebutted Prashant Bhushan’s request seeking an in-house probe into the CJI’s actions.
The Loya case being assigned to a particular bench by the CJI was one of the issues raised by the four protesting judges at their press conference Friday.
बयानबाजी से बचने की न्यायपालिका की अघोषित अचार संहिता को तोड़कर जजों ने जो संकट पैदा किया है वह क्या मोड़ लेगा, यह मुख्य न्यायाधीश दीपक मिश्रा पर निर्भर है.
Neither state govts nor companies earn large profits from lotteries. However, a look at the system shows there’s ample evidence of murky dealings and financial irregularities.
In an interview with Gulistan News this week, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said the government would leave law and order to J&K Police and slowly withdraw troops.
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
As many big cases like Ramandir, aadhar, tripple talaq which india need to be conclusive stage is being handeled by CJI & may come judgment before 2019 which will b against position maintained by oppoition . So dis impechment nautanki.
A very fraught course of action. The opposition might wish not to bring things to this pass. The only real case of impeachment was of Justice Ramaswami. The lack of votes reflected not innocence or guilt so much as political calculations. That is how it would play out in the present case as well. The ruling formation would take upon itself the role of ” defending ” CJI Dipak Misra, irredemably painting the higher judiciary with a political hue. 2. There have undoubtedly been tainted judges who deserved to be removed from office. That function is best performed by the collegium, after a detailed internal enquiry. As the case of former CJI K G Balakrishnan demonstrates, the higher judiciary does not always set for its own the high standards of probity it enforces against other organs of the state.
As many big cases like Ramandir, aadhar, tripple talaq which india need to be conclusive stage is being handeled by CJI & may come judgment before 2019 which will b against position maintained by oppoition . So dis impechment nautanki.
A very fraught course of action. The opposition might wish not to bring things to this pass. The only real case of impeachment was of Justice Ramaswami. The lack of votes reflected not innocence or guilt so much as political calculations. That is how it would play out in the present case as well. The ruling formation would take upon itself the role of ” defending ” CJI Dipak Misra, irredemably painting the higher judiciary with a political hue. 2. There have undoubtedly been tainted judges who deserved to be removed from office. That function is best performed by the collegium, after a detailed internal enquiry. As the case of former CJI K G Balakrishnan demonstrates, the higher judiciary does not always set for its own the high standards of probity it enforces against other organs of the state.