Before social media, depiction of violence on news was the exception—graphic visuals were either not shown on TV or in newspapers or the images were blurred. This is no longer the case.
Neither state govts nor companies earn large profits from lotteries. However, a look at the system shows there’s ample evidence of murky dealings and financial irregularities.
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
Nehru was NOT a pacifist even by a long shot. Claims of India moving away from Nehru’s worldview from 1990-91 would upset PV Narasimha Rao himself. One can never find a truer Nehruvian than PV. PV repeatedly claimed he was following Nehruvian policies. The Industrial Policy of 1991 gives full credit to Nehru. Anyone who claims that Nehru did not understand history of India, never heard of Glimpses of World History and Discovery of India. To suggest Congress won every single election under Nehru from 1937 till his death while Nehru was divorced from masses is divorce from reality itself.
Author neither understands Nehru nor history. Every single sentense is a lie. JB Kriplani sadi “Nehru was idealist in thought but realist in speech and action”. Non-alignment did not isolate India, not least of which was West. As the picture above proves, Nehru-Eisenhover era was golden age of Indo-American Relationship. If Tibet annexation is thought to be meekly accepted by Nehru, 56 inch chest Modi is now free to launch invasion and liberate Tibet. China is founding member of UNSC and Nehru was in jail under British rule and hence had nothing to with it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking J&K issue to UN. By falsely claiming Kashmir is in hands UN, Indians have been enabling separatism and Pakistani aggression, and betraying the Kashmiri Hindus and soldiers.
Sure, cows and Hinduism don’t need protection either. If they are great they’ll survive else become history. Why protect India? Withdraw all army from border. If India is great it will survive.
Nehru was NOT a pacifist even by a long shot. Claims of India moving away from Nehru’s worldview from 1990-91 would upset PV Narasimha Rao himself. One can never find a truer Nehruvian than PV. PV repeatedly claimed he was following Nehruvian policies. The Industrial Policy of 1991 gives full credit to Nehru. Anyone who claims that Nehru did not understand history of India, never heard of Glimpses of World History and Discovery of India. To suggest Congress won every single election under Nehru from 1937 till his death while Nehru was divorced from masses is divorce from reality itself.
Author neither understands Nehru nor history. Every single sentense is a lie. JB Kriplani sadi “Nehru was idealist in thought but realist in speech and action”. Non-alignment did not isolate India, not least of which was West. As the picture above proves, Nehru-Eisenhover era was golden age of Indo-American Relationship. If Tibet annexation is thought to be meekly accepted by Nehru, 56 inch chest Modi is now free to launch invasion and liberate Tibet. China is founding member of UNSC and Nehru was in jail under British rule and hence had nothing to with it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking J&K issue to UN. By falsely claiming Kashmir is in hands UN, Indians have been enabling separatism and Pakistani aggression, and betraying the Kashmiri Hindus and soldiers.
Sure, cows and Hinduism don’t need protection either. If they are great they’ll survive else become history. Why protect India? Withdraw all army from border. If India is great it will survive.