Arif Mohammad Khan | File photo | PTI
Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan | File photo | PTI
Text Size:

Thiruvananthapuram: Welcoming the Opposition Congress’ plan to move a resolution against him in the state Assembly over the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act, Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan on Saturday said he was functioning as per the Constitution.

The governor’s statement came hours after Leader of Opposition Ramesh Chennithala said the party will move a resolution in the Assembly, seeking his recall for “violating” all democratic principles and “publicly questioning” the pride of the legislature.

“Most welcome,” Khan said when asked about the Opposition move against him.

“Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I am the constitutional head of the state. It’s my duty to advice, counsel, encourage and warn the government.

It’s part of my duty as per the Constitution and as interpreted by the Supreme Court also,” he told media on the sidelines of a programme here.

Khan said there was no confrontation with the government, but reiterated that the state’s move to approach the apex court against CAA without informing him was not right.

“There maybe some difference of opinion but it cannot be termed as confrontation,” Khan, who has been over loggerheads with the state government for past few weeks, said.

On reports that the Governor had expressed discontent over the reported mention of the Anti-CAA resolution passed by the Assembly, in the policy address to be read by him on the first day budget session, Khan said he had just informed the government on how to “improve the content of the documents” submitted to him.

“In the constitutional provision with regard to the policy address itself, it is mentioned that the speech should be about the developmental aspects of the state.

As far as I understand, Governor is of the opinion that since the Citizenship Act is not under the jurisdiction of the state government, there was no need for it to be mentioned.

Also, since the matter is sub judice, it was not right to mention it in the Assembly,” a Raj Bhavan official said.

Chennithala has said that he has given a notice to Speaker P Sreeramakrishnan seeking his permission to move the resolution in the Assembly under the rule 130 of the legislative business.

He accused the Governor of publicly challenging the unanimous resolution passed by the state Assembly against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019 enacted by the Parliament during its winter session.

“Even the single member of the BJP in the Kerala Assembly did not cast his vote against the resolution passed by the Assembly against the CAA.

But, the Governor has made public statements saying it was unconstitutional,” he told a press conference here.


Also read: Kerala assembly has no constitutional or legal validity over citizenship law, says governor


 

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

3 Comments Share Your Views

3 COMMENTS

  1. Three decades back also, Arif Mohammed Khan was the victim of congress’ machinations. When Shah Bano judgment issue errupted, he was a central minister and was chosen to speak for the government. He vigorously defended the supreme court judgment. But, Rajiv Gandhi, behind his back brought law in parliament which annulled the judgment in Shah Bano case. As a principled person Arif Mohammed Khan resigned immediately. Three decades later, congress once again targets him. Congress will never learn lessons from history or from its own past. It is doomed to perish and disappear from Indian polity.

  2. A law passed by Parliament of India which represents whole of India becomes unconstitutional, but a vindictive resolution on a matter not pertaining to the state is constitutional. And these guys are saying they want to uphold constitution ?

    We are really tired of this tu-tu-mein-mein. If you don’t like something, convince voters to vote for you and undo the act.

  3. What does the Congress & other Opposition Parties want to achieve by passing a resolution against the Governor?

    It is totally a meaningless step that can achieve nothing

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here