scorecardresearch
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionThree years ago, Masaan brilliantly captured sexuality and aspiration in small town...

Three years ago, Masaan brilliantly captured sexuality and aspiration in small town India

Follow Us :
Text Size:

In the third anniversary week of Neeraj Ghaywan’s landmark Masaan, sharing my reflections on how it saw the rise of the small-town Indian, powered by the cheap private education-motorcycle-smartphone trinity.

Indian cinema reflects change in our society, economy, lifestyles, attitudes and even sexuality more sharply than any pundits. Lately it has discovered small-town India, much before even politicians found it. You might say that my simplistic, impressionable non-filmi mind was blown away by watching Neeraj Ghaywan’s brilliant, brilliant Masaan, which gets the pulse of small-town India as no other I had seen. It certainly left a deep impact on me as it will on the minds of most who watch it. But it has only confirmed a trend that we saw emerge with Shaad Ali’s Bunty aur Babli and then mature in the following years with Omkara, Ishqiya, Love, Sex aur Dhokha, Dev.D, Gangs of Wasseypur, NH 10 and then Masaan.

Even in the relatively romantic category there’s been Shuddh Desi Romance, Raanjhanaa, Ishaqzaade, Tanu Weds Manu and sequel and, at the blockbuster level, Dabangg and Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi, Sultan and Dangal. Over the past decade or so, small-town India has emerged as a sharply defined genre in Hindi cinema as much as the village used to be till the furious and frustrating seventies, when it yielded to the metro and the all-conquering angry young man and “gaon ki gori” became a Disco-dancing diva.

We can view this change through the prism of political economy. It is safe to say that the change today is the logical step ahead of what Dil Chahta Hai indicated in 2001. Exactly a decade after economic reform was launched, this was our first hit that unabashedly celebrated being rich. Until then, Hindi movies had reflected the popular politics of the period, which was to glorify poverty, to mock rich “Tata-Birla” types and keep hammering in the point that real joy, virtue and morality belonged to the poor.

In that Farhan Akhtar film, all three men were rich, spoilt, drove fancy cars, drank champagne, and had equally rich girlfriends. In the usual Hindi film until then, one of them would have been the son of a widowed cleaning lady in the home of one of the other two, who would go to eat in her kitchen and tell her aunty, nobody can cook like you. But this was so strikingly unapologetic even the largely political National Interest had to take note of it (‘Ah, the Sweet Smell of Poverty!’ September 1, 2001). As a matter of fact, the expression “povertarian” I claim trademark on, grew out of reflecting on the film: poverty is my birthright, but you shall have it.

This was followed by more than a decade of cinema of the rich, often NRIs, peaking probably with Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara and Dil Dhadakne Do — a film unabashed about first world problems of the beautiful and the rich. If this is now yielding to the story of the small town, it tells us two things: one, Hindi filmmakers have picked up change that some of us outdoors journalists have been calling the rise of aspirational India. And two, that the change that 1991 started, which helped us respect wealth, and adore our entrepreneurs, is now in the 25th year, trickling down into the small town and the rapidly urbanising village.


Also readBollywood’s Royals- Brave heroes on screen, spineless zeroes off it


Without giving anything in the plot away, since I still want you to watch it if you didn’t three years ago, let me mention my favourite scene in Masaan. Richa Chadda, playing Devi Pathak, intense and aspirational daughter of an impoverished priest on the burning ghats of Varanasi, works as a booking clerk at a railway station and freezes when a grungy urban boy-girl pair chat in front of her window if they should go someplace and stay overnight together, and then ask for two tickets. Devi’s resentful eyes look at her monitor that shows 26 empty seats and yet she tells them no, there are no seats left. She is poor, but educated, small-town but aspirational, knows something about the opprobrium and victimisation that would follow if she chose to spend even a couple of hours in intimacy with a boyfriend. This can be an old story in most of Middle India. But now she won’t accept it. This boy and girl, about her age, won’t be given what she is denied because of where she comes from.

The common thread in this genre is how rapidly our small-town attitudes are changing. Hyper-connectivity, education — even if at useless engineering or management colleges — wheels and the media are the four factors bridging the big-small town divide, disrupting caste and social barriers, but widening the generation gap. If in Banaras or Bareilly, Hoshangabad or Hathras, the first point of contact between a girl and a boy at that endocrinologically well-endowed stage of their lives will be on Facebook, on first name terms, when courtship will begin with one accepting the other’s “friend” request, by the time the parents and the families start delving into serious issues like caste, it will be too late. This may even explain the rise in “honour” killings. Or when 20-something women will discover sexuality not through the usual aunty gossip or whispers but watching pornography on cheap smart phones even in their poor households. They are likely to go out exploring rather than wait for marriage. And when they are “caught” and angry parents ask why-the-hell, they could even say, simply, that I was curious.

This combination of cheap smartphone-motorcycle-private colleges has totally devastated old, “traditional” notions of family relationships, ambition and sexuality. When we saw the first statement of this change, in Anurag Kashyap’s Dev.D, with Mahie Gill carrying a mattress on her bicycle for a tryst with Abhay Deol in a sugarcane field — where else would you find privacy in a village in deep Punjab — we were shocked, and titillated. But that is the changed, new Bharatiya nari. The smarter filmmakers found her first. And now audiences are accepting it, because this is so reflective of what they see in their families and neighbourhood.

This young new Indian is no longer resigned to fate, is willing to move out with bags, or by dumping the baggage of the parents’ generation. The city is not as distant as it used to be.

The first people to sniff this, and put it in verse were usual suspects, Gulzar and Jaideep Sahni, when they wrote, sort of together, the theme song of Bunty aur Babli: ‘Chhote chhote shehron se’. In an interview with me later, Jaideep (who has written brilliantly for Chak De! India, Khosla ka Ghosla, etc) said he was still searching for a line to complete an idea that would best sum up the film when Gulzar came up with “khali bore dopaharon se, hum toh jhola uthaake chale (we escape bag and baggage from small towns and their idle, boring afternoons)” and that pretty much set the story up. This young new Indian is no longer resigned to fate, is willing to move out with bags, or by dumping the baggage of the parents’ generation. The city is not as distant as it used to be.

There are perils in self-referencing, but what used to be called mofussil India has come a long way, post-reform, from where my generation was brought up. When your only window to the world was short wave radio, training in spoken English was cricket commentary of Berry Sarbadhikari, Melville de Mellow and V.M. Chakrapani that your parents forced you to hear rather than Ravi Chaturvedi and Jasdev Singh, however brilliant their Hindi. Or when a really kind teacher would save up for a bus ride to Delhi to pick up old copies of Time and Life magazines from the then famous Kabaadi Bazaar (flea market) next to Jama Masjid for his favourite, and more curious, pupils. Today, you could learn to speak English and follow anybody and anything in the world on your phone, and never mind your accent and diction because your boss or consort will also likely be desi and not self-conscious.

In several of my reports under my prolific ‘Writings on the Wall’ series, I have attempted to portray this generation of Indians as aspirational, ambitious, impatient, post-ideological, even a me-first, won’t-be-left-behind, I-don’t-owe-nobody-nothing generation. In 2014, they were infuriated by Rahul Gandhi’s references to his grandmother and fired by Narendra Modi’s promise of the Gujarat model. But our enormously more creative filmmakers are now bringing them to our lives on the big screen. You can see how this generation brought about the political upheaval of May 2014 as they saw in Modi someone more likely to take them forward rather than Rahul and his message of self-pity. Within months, you saw them make a complete turnaround in Delhi. You will bore them with mandir, masjid, cow or caste, Hindi medium, what to eat, social conservatism at your own peril.

Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this article was published in July 2015.


Also read: Cutesy for Sanju to hurl ‘ma-behen ki’ at journalists. But it can’t rewrite evil 1993 plot


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

5 COMMENTS

  1. Wonderfully written piece about a wonderful nuanced movie. The generation and the rift from previous ones is well presented. The times are changing and so are we.

  2. Shekhar Sir,NRC draft list of Assam has been published today and given your field reporting and wide experience of the Assam Agitation,was expecting an article related to that today.
    Thanks!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular