Representational image | A research assistant at the artificial heart development laboratory at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur | Photo: Sumit Dayal | Bloomberg
Representational image | A research assistant at the artificial heart development laboratory at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur | Photo: Sumit Dayal | Bloomberg
Text Size:

The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Council announced on 4 October a significant fee hike for their Master of Technology (MTech) courses. Accordingly, the current fee amount of Rs 20,000 to Rs 50,000 per year (depending on the IIT) will be gradually increased to Rs 2,00,000 per year over the course of the next three years. This will only come into effect 2020 onwards and will not be applicable to current students. While the fee waivers/concessions for socially and economically disadvantaged class remains, the monthly stipend of Rs 12,400 to each student will be replaced with paid Teaching Assistantships (TAs) that could cover up to half the tuition fees.

On face value, this fee increase is astronomical (more than 800 percent) and has been met with resistance from certain stakeholders. However, the IIT Council has defended the move as a necessary one. In isolation, it can be argued that a fee hike for a Masters course in the IITs has been long overdue. Currently, a student from IIT at the undergraduate level pays almost 10 times more than his/her post graduate counterpart. It is a disparity that is part of a larger systemic issue, not least of which, is the diminishing value of MTech courses at India’s premier technology institutes.

One of the reasons given for this fee increase is that several students who have enrolled into MTech courses leave midway for jobs in the civil services or public sector undertakings. Basically, they use the stipend provided by IIT MTech courses as a comfortable intermediary to apply for government jobs. So, increasing the fees will mean only “serious’’ students enroll into these courses. However, this paints an incomplete picture and does not take into account the need to revamp MTech courses.


Also read: IIT mania is costing students quality time at schools. But CBSE, other bodies still sleeping


For starters, despite being a post graduate degree, MTech courses (even in IITs) have lost relevance in the job market. Most of these courses have undergone little change in the last two to three decades. Students do not perceive the MTech degree to be a significant value addition to their profile. Rarely does one hear of students pursuing both their BTech as well as MTech degrees from an IIT. Placement reports from different IITs show that the undergraduate programmes have better employment rates. For instance, in 2017-19, 87 percent of BTech graduates were employed while the corresponding number for MTech students stood at 60 percent.

So while increasing fees may deter students who are seeking public sector employment opportunities from enrolling, it does not automatically ensure the presence of a sizeable pool of students who will willingly pursue a course that does not offer commensurate employment opportunities. Every year, a number of Indian students pursue technical post graduate degrees in foreign universities through sizeable education loans, since the potential of prospective employment is significant. However, to just increase fees of the MTech courses in IITs without ensuring a proportionate improvement in quality may turn out to be counterproductive.

In addition to the fee hike, the IIT Council has recommended PhD fellowship grants to the top 1 percentile of students appearing for GATE exams. The basis for this reform is rooted in the belief that a Masters degree is increasingly becoming less of a pre requisite for pursuing PhDs – both in India and abroad. However, different college as well as university departments continue to attach value to Masters degree in their points system for faculty appointments. While the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) does not prevent direct PhD holders for faculty appointments, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has norms which prevent the same without a Masters degree. Thus, while the MTech in its current form may not be an ideal preparatory ground for PhDs, it remains a qualifying one for faculty appointments. Therefore, it is premature to negate its importance for students who plan to pursue an academic career without changing norms for faculty appointments.


Also read: Abhijit Banerjee’s Nobel in the US: Is it a comment on the quality of Indian institutions?


In addition to preference towards public sector jobs, the high attrition rate in MTech courses is also because of the heterogeneous mix of students in these courses. While the undergraduate courses (BTech) in IITs depend on Joint Entrance Examinations (JEE) and then JEE Advanced for admissions, the MTech courses use the Graduate Aptitude in Engineering (GATE) exams as the yardstick. This is important since there is a significant variance in the quality of education provided in different engineering colleges across the country. The mushrooming of colleges in the last decade without strict adherence to quality has led to significant disparity among colleges. This is evidenced by the common annual occurrence of a number of engineering colleges having 50 percent vacant seats at the BTech level, while all the 23 IITs have hardly any wasted seats for the corresponding courses. Thus, undergraduate students who have received below par engineering education struggle to cope at the Masters level. This is a larger issue that needs structural reforms of the entire engineering education ecosystem.

To be clear, increasing cost of post graduate education in India is in line with global realities of higher education. Specialised technical education demands quality infrastructure and faculty, both of which are investment intensive. Such courses must be dynamic enough to be relevant to the changing nature of jobs, have fruitful industry collaborations and be financially sustainable in the long run. However, increasing fees without making programmes attractive enough to students is a piecemeal solution at best. Undergraduate education in IITs holds immense aspirational value. For post graduate education to do the same, a systemic overhaul must be undertaken – one that includes higher fees.

The author is an Associate Fellow at ORF Mumbai. Views are personal.

This article was first published on ORF.

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

5 Comments Share Your Views

5 COMMENTS

  1. Suppose I pay the increased fee and after that I get into a PSU.What will I do ?Will I not join the PSU? Definitely I will.Even after increasing fees 10 folds,students will drop out if they get PSUs.Reason is PSUs pay a lot.₹200000 fees in nothing as compared to the salaries in PSUs.So,the problem of student dropout will still remain the same.
    One thing this move will achieve is it will make sure middle class or lower middle students will not come to do masters because of the fees.They should have first changed the course structure,made it look industry friendly,then ask for this high fees.Will anyone pay ₹2lacs to do Masters at IIT Mandi in CS field.The answer is no.

    This gives undue advantage to rich students.Our undergraduates engineering colleges are in bad shape.Masters in IITs allowed students to choose between research and industry.At Undergraduate level very few think about doing PhD.This decision will indirectly effect the quality of PhD in the country.

  2. Certain IIT’s have M.Tech programmes in non-conventional, interdisciplinary streams. For e.g.Technology and Development (T&D) in IIT-B. In this case, those who graduate from this programme are expected to work in the development sector if not (immediately) interested in pursuing research.
    Part of the students enrolling in this programme would like to work in this sector while rest may want to explore other opportunities at IIT-B.
    Since our government-bureaucratic system is yet to acknowledge the utility of having young T&D graduates in their machinery, most job offers currently are from nongovernmental organizations whose remunerations (though improved over the years) is not par with mainstream institutions. Historically, the attrition rate from T&D is between 0-2/ year. Implying that most students join the programme for being part of the larger developmental cause. The intended changes in the M.Tech fee and stipend structure may have an adverse effect on T&D and similar offbeat programmes in IIT’s elsewhere. After all, they too have to support their families and have aspirations.

    • Well said…I was also thinking to join ctara in 2020…but now i can’t…because i can’t take more money from parents and already having a education loan of 4lacs for btech.

  3. The MTech courses are there to keep the faculty busy. This is the reality. Now with the fee increase there will be a drop in the students enrolling and the teachers will have less amount of teaching work.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here