scorecardresearch
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionModi MonitorArun Jaitley is returning to North Block, but Modi may’ve moved chess...

Arun Jaitley is returning to North Block, but Modi may’ve moved chess pieces in his absence

Follow Us :
Text Size:

Industry is thrilled with Prime Minister’s comments in Lucknow, which called out the hypocrisy around wealth creation.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is bringing ‘Minister without Portfolio’ Arun Jaitley back to his beloved finance ministry by late August after a three-month-long hiatus during which he was recovering from a kidney transplant. This means that Piyush Goyal, who was holding interim charge, will revert to his old ministries of railways and coal without a murmur.

Jaitley’s return to Number Two position in the Modi cabinet was a given. He is too senior, has been in the BJP for too long, and perhaps is the only man in the party who has good relations with the opposition – the quintessential Dilliwallah with an enormous network of friends, family and acquaintances.

Herein, however, hangs a longer tale that has long been whispered in the corridors of power. Jaitley will certainly be back, but in his absence, Goyal is said to have been encouraged to move the pieces so as to undercut his own mentor-predecessor.

Certainly, this could not have happened without the protection offered to Goyal by Prime Minister Modi and BJP president Amit Shah.


Also read: How Arun Jaitley persuaded Narendra Modi to soften his stand on homosexuality in India


The first move came in early July when Goyal introduced a scheme to reduce bad loans in banks, called ‘Project Sashakt’. Led by the chairman of Punjab National Bank, Sunil Mehta, the panel recommended a variety of ways to reduce these non-performing assets, including inter-creditor arrangements.

Now this would all be very well, except that Jaitley had two years ago introduced the pathbreaking Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to encourage loss-making companies to sell themselves. The idea was to exhort both companies and employees to move on and not be stuck in the miasma of bad money, incompetence and even self-hate.

Bhushan Steel, now being bought by Tata Steel, is the best-cited example of the success of the IBC. All sides win here. The company losing money gets a fair share, the bank that has loaned the money to the losing company gets its loan back, and the company buying out the loss-making outfit is happy it got a good deal.

The IBC’s transparent procedures allowed both sides to state their cases in front of a tribunal and the move was much applauded by the industry.

So the question that industry is now asking is, why upset the applecart? Fact is: Goyal’s ‘Project Sashakt’ essentially unravels Jaitley’s IBC.

Here’s another straw in the wind. Even as the PM’s remarks in Lucknow a few days ago, saying he was “not scared of standing next to businessmen,” were being widely welcomed by the industry, other questions began to surface.

First, what was the need for ‘Project Sashakt’ when the IBC was already doing a good job? And, did the PM’s remarks mean that the government would now look at businesspeople more kindly than in the last four years?

There are several problems with Goyal’s pet scheme, not the least that it has been proposed by a panel led by the PNB chairman. Considering the PNB is in the throes of recovering losses worth several thousand crores from diamantaire Nirav Modi, who has simply fled abroad, the guidance is hardly encouraging.

Second, the proposal opens the door for banks to be directly involved in a three-tier repayment of loans. So if the banker likes your face, or more importantly if s/he gets a phone call from a certain powerful someone saying, ‘Iska thoda paisa maaf kar do,’ or please give him a discount on his debt, the banker may have no choice but to agree.

The charge of cronyism has begun to attach itself to ‘Project Sashakt’. The questions are refusing to go away. In contrast, the IBC left it to the buyer and seller to decide how they wanted to cut the coat according to their cloth.


Also read:  Congress gave rural India populist slogans, PM Modi has delivered the goods: Arun Jaitley


Murmurs in the industry, that goalposts are being shifted because of the coming state and national elections, are becoming louder.

As for the PM’s remarks in Lucknow, industrialists are certainly thrilled that at last someone is calling out the hypocrisy over the creation of wealth. The PM had tweeted at the time:

To which, industrialist Anand Mahindra replied:

According to the Association of Democratic Reforms, a think-tank which tracks political funding, the BJP has received Rs 991 crore in corporate donations since it came to power in 2014, compared to Rs 173 crore to the Congress party.

The PM is right. It is so much better to say who is funding whom, upfront.

But some industrialists and entrepreneurs are also wondering whether the PM’s Lucknow comments are a vote for Goyal and ‘Project Sashakt’ and thumbs down for Jaitley’s IBC.

As the PM moves the chess pieces in the last year before general elections are called, both the industry and the general public are closely watching Jaitley’s impending return to the finance ministry – and how he’s going to deal with the changes that have taken place in his absence.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

2 COMMENTS

  1. Modi does not need to do all the back room tricks to put Jaitley in his place. He can do it directly, if he so wishes to do it. While Modi and this government needs Jaitley, it is a different issue if he needs to be fianance minister. While he has done good things like excellent macro management of economy, GST and IBC, he has messed up quite few like privatization of banks and other PSUs, Air India, income tax, land reforms, etc. While Project Shashakht is an idea coming on usual and expected lines from public sector bankers, it is also a moot point if NCLT can take a massive load of so many NPA cases. In that sense, another mechanism is required for small and medium industry borrowers. Of course, Jyoti can only see what her glasses filter and twists for her and hence, an interesting article from the Print!

  2. Sorry, I don’t agree with the assessment here. Debt resolution and insolvancy are 2 separate vehicles. Why conflate the two? They exist in every country, for very different purposes. Insolvancy, by design is a long drawn process where an entity has to go through a tribunal. And worse, if there is a court case the whole process gets stuck for years. Bhushan still was the best case where they had a 40% haircut as TATA was willing to buy them out and the fact that the steel plants were fairly mordern. In most cases insolvancies result in upto 95% haircut for the bank. Allowing the banks to negotiate a settlement, say for the principal, is often a more feasible option instead of the final insolvency hammer where the recoveries are small and the risk of mothballing is high. Goyal has been very practical here.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular