PM Modi and state chief ministers attend a video conference Monday | Photo: ANI
PM Modi and state chief ministers attend a video conference Monday | Photo: ANI
Text Size:

The sight of Prime Minister Narendra Modi holding a marathon meeting with the chief ministers of India was something to behold. A patient Modi was finally listening to the opinion of others. The Modi we have seen at the helm since 2014 isn’t one who seems to feel the need for consultations. Just 50 days back, he announced the first lockdown — without consulting with the states that had to implement it. Most of his big-ticket announcements have happened via sudden addresses to the nation or without broad consensus – be it demonetisation or scrapping Article 370 or lockdown.

The coronavirus pandemic, however,  is bringing about major changes — not just in the world but also in our Prime Minister. Modi has held multiple video conferences with chief ministers, sarpanches of gram panchayats, and even AYUSH professionals.

But even this consultation with CMs was earlier limited to a third of them attending – some from very small states, or those with issues of language didn’t attend or were not allotted time to speak.

In the 11 May meeting, however, the states spoke their mind – West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee expressed anger at ‘politics’ during the time of Covid-19 and many chief ministers talked of the migrant workers’ problem.

The PM asked the chief ministers to come up post-Lockdown 3 plans. So far, so good.

Is it then a signal of things to come? An indication that Modi will function very differently from how he has over the last six years? Will Covid-19 make India the truly federal state that it was supposed to be or will it remain a one-man show?


Also read: Day before trains restart, many CMs urge PM Modi not to restore services until 31 May

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW


Modus operandi — surprise and shock

The Narendra Modi government functions on both the vision of its leader and the desire to spring a surprise, leaving no wiggle room or space for debates.

The planning commission was dismantled early on in Modi’s tenure. Then came demonetisation via an 8 pm address to the nation in 2016. Then a spate of policy decisions in his second term made a splash as much for the speed with which they were taken as well as the surprise element attached to them. Be it the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, or diluting Article 370 and dividing Jammu and Kashmir into Union Territories, or the Citizenship (Amendment) Act along with nationwide NRC. Protests and bellicose opposition made no impact on Modi, and sealed and strengthened his reputation of being autocratic. He had little time for consultation with his own ministers, let alone the opposition, and didn’t seem too bothered about traditions and niceties.

Modi’s initial day-long Janata Curfew was almost like a trailer for the real show, which would come through an address to the nation later, a 21-day lockdown with a notice of just four hours. Modi prescribed a Covid-19 ‘cure’ and all the states had to dutifully follow it, no matter the chaos it created.


Also read: Modi got all the credit for lockdown. Now, he wants states to share risk of unlocking India


A democratic Modi?

Monday’s meeting saw states asking for legroom to formulate their own plans to curtail the spread of the coronavirus and decide on the lockdown. But they still seemed to be dependent on the Centre for directives and direction and, of course, financial aid.

This was the most democratic one has seen Modi so far. The TV visuals of Modi interacting with a screen full of chief ministers made social media light up. The Congress even suggested such meetings every month.

So, the question is, should a crisis like this call for Modi to change his style of functioning and truly become the chief of a federation of states? Is it time for Modi to shed his autocratic behaviour and top-down approach and opt for consensus and reconciliation so that the collective wisdom of all leaders can help India tide over the pandemic? 

Or is it too much to expect the leopard to change his spots? Modi asked the chief ministers to give ideas and a broad plan to fight Covid-19. Then, just 24 hours later, addressed the nation and stole the CMs’ thunder by announcing a Rs 20-lakh crore package.


Also read: Modi’s Rs 20 lakh-crore package will help India’s economy only if it reaches the states


With this attitude, can one even think of any sort of consensus government in which the ruling party and opposition rises above party politics? Maybe something like what Winston Churchill had accomplished in wartime England – an all-party coalition. Or like Telangana Chief Minister K. Chandrashekhar Rao’s dream project of a federal front of all regional parties except the BJP and the Congress, which he was pursuing before the 2019 polls.

Or is this idea unfathomable at a time when the BJP has a clear majority and the opposition is not quite pink in health? Also, all the previous dinner photo ops of party leaders gathering at Sonia Gandhi’s residence or rallying at Brigade Parade Ground in Kolkata just before the 2019 Lok Sabha elections showed the schisms in the opposition quite clearly.

Will Modi now become a man of consensus and take the country out of this economic, social and health crisis with the confidence of a statesman and humility of a mass leader?

Views are personal.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

9 Comments Share Your Views

9 COMMENTS

  1. One more problem for Modi haters. One less reason for them to criticise him. And now if the migrant workers still vote for BJP in upcoming elections, where does that leave those professional activists, the NGOs, the media portals etc who have got funding from foreign and other dubious sources, with the promise of delivering regime change?

  2. Access journalist at its best. The Print has made its mission to praise public servants and indulge in supposedly objective / on the sly praise of politicians.

    In fact, for the past month, I look at The Print’s home page to see which public servant is being praised. Or, some known name type writing his ‘opinion’. Indian Express lite, eh? Very, very light.

  3. Print only has one mature journalist, it is the founder. Rest are just fresh graduates with a lot of opinions but no life experience.
    They just jumble together a few words, mention some European examples and presto a hate Modi article is done.
    They are just trolls.

  4. What total TRIPE !

    India is NOT a Federal Republic and the Prime Minister is not a chief of a federation of states! The idiocy of “”rule by committee” has seem many a nation sink into quagmire and it is only too recently that India had a “”Commission”” of alliance partners who decided Governance while the Prime Minister was the Prime puppet of an unaccountable “”chairperson”” who had no responsibility.

    State have their own Governments for efficiency of Governance – not for the absurd logic of utilizing the “”Wisdom of crowds”” in governance. The Central Government is a distinct and separate entity from State Govts and Modi being a former CM knows this only too well. What he could do as CM is can’t as PM and vice versa. That’s the way it ought to be and rightly so – the Prime Minister’s job is not to rule by consensus – his job is to rule by leadership and giving policy directions. In this regard as Modi has rightly said – the Center has succeeded in marshalling the resources of the Union in providing leadership and resources to the states.

    The states are required to improvise when necessary but largely carry out the effective implementation on the ground, to take care of their people. They have no business in grand policy and deciding about issues they have no insight into . Quite simply the CMs have no earned that right ! They were elected to govern their state – not the country.

  5. It only brings out the bias ( if charitable) / stupidity( being realistic)/ or Lazy thinking, of journalists. For all of them the guiding motto is ‘ Negativity Sells’. Modi was always very clear in his thinking. Never consult overtly when the decision was solely his responsibility. And when circumstances called he will move forward only after consultation, with all stakeholders. Covid19 pandemic belongs to the latter category.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here