Home Judiciary Modi govt doesn’t want lawyer son-in-law of J&K ‘separatist’ elevated to HC,...

Modi govt doesn’t want lawyer son-in-law of J&K ‘separatist’ elevated to HC, SC to decide

Advocate Javed Iqbal Wani is son-in-law of Mian Abdul Qayoom — one of the founding members of Hurriyat who NIA had summoned in a terror funding case.

Maneesh Chhibber
The NIA is probing Qayoom's alleged role in funding of terror organisations in J&K | Screengrab from AP video

New Delhi: The Supreme Court collegium is soon going to decide on the appointment of four lawyers to the Jammu & Kashmir High Court. The names had been recommended by the J&K High Court collegium in March. 

However, what is making the Supreme Court collegium’s job a tad difficult is an adverse report by intelligence agencies about the “close links” one of the candidates has with a top separatist leader.

The candidate, advocate Javed Iqbal Wani, is the son-in-law of Mian Abdul Qayoom, president of the Kashmir Bar Association who allegedly propagates the cause of separatists.

Qayoom is also known to be one of the founding members of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference led by separatist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani. He has close links with Geelani and provides legal assistance to the separatists in the Valley. He also has a history of fighting cases, which the government thinks go against the national interest.

Sources said following the negative intelligence reports, the Centre had last month communicated to the Supreme Court collegium that it is opposed to Wani being cleared for elevation to the HC bench.

According to reports, Wani was being considered for appointment as assistant solicitor general by the Narendra Modi government. However, the appointment never fructified.

In February this year, Governor Satya Pal Malik appointed him senior additional advocate general.

Incidentally, as a lawyer, Wani has handled several high-profile cases, including the Pathribal fake encounter case in which he appeared for the Indian Army.

Sources in the apex court told ThePrint that the intelligence report doesn’t have any specific inputs to establish that Wani shares his father-in-law’s ideology.

More importantly, Wani has himself categorically denied that he shares or follows Qayoom’s political agenda.

Apart from Wani, the other names recommended by the high court collegium were of advocates Rajnesh Oswal, Rahul Bharti and Moksha Khajuria-Kazmi.


Also read: SC collegium rejects Madras HC chief justice’s request to reconsider transfer to Meghalaya


Qayoom was detained after Article 370 move

Qayoom is the longest-serving president of the Kashmir Bar Association — he was first elected in 1986. Such is his support base — many allege that he draws his strength from his support to the cause of separatists and anti-India forces active in Kashmir — that he has often won unopposed.

Incidentally, Qayoom’s law degree is also under scanner.

He was detained a number of times in 2017, including under the Public Safety Act, on charges of spreading anti-India propaganda. Qayoom was also summoned by the National Investigation Agency for his alleged role in funding of terror organisations.

He was among those detained by the J&K Police after the Centre’s decision to abrogate Article 370 on 5 August


Also read: Modi govt considering taking on SC collegium over 4 HC judges picked for elevation


 

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Mr Sanjeev. You’re comparing oranges vs apples…get this fact right hurriyat is supporting terrorism in our state of j& k and the rest of the country, in this case the candidate is not a person obligated to the state but his extremist views and proximity to the enemies of the state. Morality doesn’t mean a thing in present times when we as a nation are under threat…. Thank you

  2. When a father cannot influence his adult son’s mind, how can a father-in-law achieve that miracle? Present SC judge justice Chandrachud’s father was a CJI himself, but I have read somewhere that Junior Chandrachud has many times opined against his father’s judgements.

    Coming to a much more dilute relationship of “father only by marriage”, like in the present context, we must remember that late Arun Jaitley’s father-in-law was a prominent Congress leader.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here