scorecardresearch
Friday, April 19, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeJudiciaryDelhi HC refuses to hear PIL to end pension disparity between armed...

Delhi HC refuses to hear PIL to end pension disparity between armed forces under MHA

The court was hearing a PIL by Humara Desh Humare Jawan Trust and said that several petitions by aggrieved personnel are already pending adjudication & under consideration.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court Thursday refused to entertain a PIL seeking direction to the Centre to extend the same pension scheme to armed forces under the Home Ministry as is applicable to the forces under the Defence Ministry.

A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, which was hearing the PIL by Humara Desh Humare Jawan Trust, said that several petitions by the aggrieved personnel are already pending adjudication.

Affected people are already before court. They don’t need a PIL. Matter is already under consideration. There is a bunch of petitions, Justice Endlaw said, adding that the outcome of the pending pleas would be applicable to those who are similarly placed.

Each and every person is not required to be there. Point which you are raising is raised by affected parties and they are ably represented, the judge told the counsel for the Trust, advocate Ajay K Agrawal

Chief Justice Patel stated that there was no need to have multiple petitions on the same issue and asked the petitioner to join the pending proceedings.

You go there and file a CM (application), Chief Justice Patel told the counsel.

The court allowed the Trust to withdraw its petition with liberty to avail other legal remedies or join the pending proceedings.

In his petition, the Trust has stated that the forces under the MHA i.e. BSF, CISF, CRPF etc are also armed forces and therefore cannot be discriminated against.

It is stated that the Centre is illegally denying the old pension scheme to the forces under MHA by making them subject to the new contributory pension scheme, which was introduced in 2004, on the ground that they are not armed forces of the Union .

These forces are protecting our borders round the clock and thousands personnel have laid their lives protecting our borders.. Both are armed forces of the Union under the Ministry of Defence and Home, therefore, there should be no disparity and same pensionary benefits should be given to both, the petition reads.

The plea states that in August 2004, the Centre has itself issued a clarification that the central forces under the MHA as also armed forces of the Union and would include the BSF, CISF, CRPF, ITBP, NSG, SSB and Assam Rifles.


Also read: Delhi HC to hear plea against Rahul Gandhi for disclosing identity of Dalit minor on 27 Sep


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular