scorecardresearch
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaNo data shared to justify need for security bill, it's 'worse than...

No data shared to justify need for security bill, it’s ‘worse than British-era laws’: Sena (UBT)

Follow Us :
Text Size:

Mumbai, Jul 16 (PTI) Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Bhaskar Jadhav on Wednesday criticised the Mahayuti government for failing to provide any data or evidence to justify the need for a bill that seeks to crack down on Left-wing extremism in Maharashtra, calling the legislation “worse than British-era laws”.

Last week, both houses of the state legislature passed the contentious Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, which seeks to prevent unlawful activities of Left-wing extremist organisations with focus on ‘urban Naxalism’.

Jadhav, an opposition MLA who served on the legislature’s joint select committee that reviewed the bill before it was presented for approval, questioned the very rationale of bringing such a legislation in the absence of relevant data.

“There was not a single piece of data presented to show any rise in Left-wing extremism or similar threats in the state. Senior police officers and government officials were present (during committee meetings), but none could answer our basic question: What is the need for this bill if there’s no data to support it?” he said while talking to reporters in Vidhan Bhavan premises.

The joint panel was headed by Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule of the BJP.

Jadhav claimed the BJP-led government has been evasive and inconsistent in its handling of the bill’s draft.

“I submitted a detailed report with point-by-point objections to the bill. Still, my concerns were ignored. The bill should have been flatly rejected,” the opposition MLA contended.

According to Jadhav, over 13,000 objections were submitted by members of the public, but the government failed to present any bifurcation or summary of those objections in the legislature.

“The government is clearly on the back foot. They could not even define terms like ‘urban Naxal” – a phrase they have used as a justification for the bill,” he added.

He accused the government of procedural lapses, saying multiple committee meetings were abruptly cancelled.

“The meeting (of the joint panel) was first scheduled on June 25, then shifted to the 26th. But when we were finally given the draft, it was the old version of the bill. Even the government had to admit it had mistakenly circulated the outdated document,” Jadhav alleged.

The Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA criticised the proposed law as excessively harsh and undemocratic.

“Not even during British rule was there such a draconian law targeting organisations and dissent. This bill goes far beyond acceptable limits. It’s more oppressive than colonial legislation,” he claimed.

The bill, which has stringent provisions, including hefty fines and jail term up to seven years for those found guilty, has sparked criticism from civil society groups and opposition parties, who view it as a tool to suppress dissent under the pretext of national security. PTI ND RSY

This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular