Supreme Court of India | Sonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images
Supreme Court of India | Sonu Mehta | Hindustan Times via Getty Images
Text Size:
  • 579
    Shares

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday dismissed two court masters for uploading a judicial order which wrongly stated that industrialist Anil Ambani was exempt from personally appearing in court in a contempt case, said a report.

Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, who is also the administrative head of the top court, sacked assistant registrars Manav Sharma and Tapan Kumar Chakraborty late Wednesday for allegedly “tampering” with the court order, said a report in The Telegraph.

Court masters are officials in charge of taking down orders that are dictated in open court or in the judges’ chambers.

Core issue

On 7 January, while adjudicating the issue of a contempt matter filed by Ericsson India, the bench of Justices Rohinton Nariman and Vineet Saran had directed Ambani to be personally present in court.

However, the order which was uploaded on the top court’s website hours later read: “Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor(s) is dispensed with.”

In contempt cases, the person who is being charged must be present in court unless it decides otherwise.

On 10 January, Ericsson India pointed out this anomaly and a revised order was uploaded that read, “Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor(s) is not dispensed with.”

Ambani was present in court on 12 and 13 February according to the 10 January order.


Also read: The MoU Anil Ambani mentioned in Airbus email was not Rafale


‘Not an accident’

According to the report in The Telegraph, the omission of the word “not” in the order wasn’t accidental. A preliminary inquiry of the incident suggested that the order was allegedly “tampered” with, the report said.

So Gogoi invoked Section 11(13) of the Supreme Court which empowered him to dismiss an employee under “extraordinary” circumstances without normal disciplinary proceedings.

When the matter initially came to light, it was revealed that the 7 January order was uploaded online without the knowledge of the two judges. The inquiry will now “get to the root of the entire issue” and attempt to identify those involved with the alleged tampering.

The Telegraph’s report said that advocates may also come under the scanner.

Last year, Ericsson India had filed a contempt case against Ambani’s Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom) to recover dues amounting to Rs 550 crore.

On Wednesday, the top court reserved its verdict in the case after a day-long hearing.


Also read: Kapil Sibal again finds a way to embarrass Rahul Gandhi, appears for Anil Ambani in court


 

Get the PrintEssential to make sense of the day's key developments


  • 579
    Shares
Share Your Views

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here