A view of Supreme Court of India | PTI Photo by Atul Yadav
The Supreme Court of India | Atul Yadav/PTI
Text Size:

Efforts to forge a consensus yield no results. Sources say Attorney General has advised CJI Dipak Misra to show restraint.

New Delhi: A day after four Supreme Court judges publicly raised questions on the functioning of the office of the Chief Justice of India, efforts to forge a consensus between them have not yielded any results.

Sources told ThePrint that a meeting between CJI Dipak Misra and Justices Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Kurian Joseph and Madan B. Lokur – the four senior-most judges after the CJI – is on the cards. But the meeting has not yet taken place since Gogoi, Joseph and Lokur have flown out of the capital for other engagements, and are unlikely to return until late Sunday evening.

Although Chelameswar insists that the four judges are united in their stand, it is unlikely he will speak on behalf of the others.

The CJI, who was caught off guard by the four judges’ unprecedented press conference Friday, had immediately summoned the government’s top law officer, Attorney General K.K. Venugopal. It is learnt that Venugopal advised Misra to show restraint and not respond immediately.

Reconciliation attempts by lawyers’ associations

Meanwhile, lawyers’ associations and the Bar Council of India (BCI) held meetings throughout the day to agree on reconciliatory methods. BCI chairman Manan Mishra said Saturday that a seven-member team would be formed by Sunday to meet the judges.

Both the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) criticised the judges’ move to hold the press conference.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

While SCAORA urged “all stakeholders to resolve issues internally within the constitutional framework”, SCBA passed a two-pronged resolution.

The first is to resolve the current impasse between the top judges through a full court reference – a joint sitting of all apex court judges. Full court references are currently held only for remembrance meetings when an eminent member of the legal fraternity passes away.

The second is to have all public interest litigation cases listed before the CJI or the next top four judges. The SCBA said this would remedy the issue raised by the senior judges that cases of importance were not being assigned to them.

Judge Loya’s death

Significantly, the controversial case seeking a probe into the death of Maharashtra trial court judge B.H. Loya is unlikely to be taken up before the apex court Monday.

The registry has cancelled hearing of the case, along with others listed for the day, since one of the two judges supposed to hear the case, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, will not be available on that day.

Justices Chelameswar, Gogoi, Joseph and Lokur had expressed anguish over the CJI’s decision to assign this case to a particular bench and not to the any of the top judges.

As per the CJI’s instructions, the case was listed before a bench of justices Arun Mishra and Shanatangowdar.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

Share Your Views

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here