Indra Sawhney, whose petition led to 50% cap on reservation, says upper-caste quota bill is unconstitutional & must be challenged in court.
New Delhi: Veteran lawyer Indra Sawhney, whose challenge to the then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao’s forward quota move in 1992 led to the 50 per cent cap on reservation, says she is shocked by the Modi government’s push for a 10 per cent quota to ‘economically weaker’ sections in the general category.
A day after a constitutional amendment to this effect was passed by the Rajya Sabha, Sawhney, 67, Thursday told ThePrint that the move sets the dangerous precedent of making India a reservation-dependent society.
“The bill violates the basic principles of the Constitution,” she said. “When reservation was brought, it was for 10 years, but now reservation has become a culture… We are moving towards a 100 per cent reservation-dependent society, it seems.”
Sawhney is synonymous with reservation politics in the country as it was in the landmark Indra Sawhney vs Union of India case, that a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court decided to put a 50 per cent cap on reservations in the country, limiting quota for Backward Classes (27 per cent), Scheduled Castes (15 per cent), and Scheduled Tribes (8 per cent).
“At the time, I was a young lawyer, and one day I got very perturbed looking at children, college and school students protesting in (Delhi’s) Jhandewalan,” she said. “I was very moved, and therefore I decided to go to court.”
Sawhney, who has otherwise fought cases for the central government, Life Insurance Corporation (LIC), Food Corporation of India (FCI), among others, says the Mandal case was a “one-off case”.
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
“I think it was just destined that way,” she said.
‘People can submit fake income certificates’
Almost three decades later, Sawhney is not sure if she will herself challenge the Modi government’s move to expand the scope of reservation and extend it to economically weaker sections. But she is clear that the move should be challenged legally.
“It is not constitutionally permissible to make economic criterion the basis for reservation…The Supreme Court has said so clearly,” she said. “I’m not sure if I will challenge it but it will be challenged in court… It’s a bad idea.”
A petition, filed in the Supreme Court Thursday by a group called Youth for Equality and Dr. Kaushal Kant Mishra, said that the amendment violates the 50 per cent ceiling laid down by the court.
Moreover, Sawhney, still a practising lawyer, says the bill does not appear to be well thought through.
“I am not sure if they have collected enough data before bringing this amendment… How will they make sure that people do not submit fake income certificates? People do it all the time,” she said.
“It is the general category that will be affected adversely by this move,” she said. “Reservation should only be limited to SCs, STs and OBCs, and even for them, it should cease to benefit their children, if they have got the benefit once,” she added. “Otherwise, it will never end.”
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.