scorecardresearch
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeJudiciaryCJI Bobde recuses himself from hearing Nirbhaya convict's plea on death penalty...

CJI Bobde recuses himself from hearing Nirbhaya convict’s plea on death penalty review

CJI Bobde said one of his relatives had earlier appeared on behalf of the victim's mother in the case, and so it would be appropriate for another bench to hear the review plea.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: Chief Justice S A Bobde recused himself on Tuesday from hearing the plea of convict Akshay Kumar Singh seeking review of the 2017 apex court judgment upholding his death penalty in the Nirbhaya gang rape-and-murder case.

At the outset, a special bench comprising CJI and Justices R Banumathi and Ashok Bhushan made it clear that review pleas has to be heard by another appropriate bench.

The CJI said one of his relatives had earlier appeared on behalf of the victim’s mother in the case and observed that it would be appropriate that some other bench hear the review plea at 10:30 am.

Advocate A P Singh, appearing for Akshay, started his submission saying that the case in hand has suffered political and media pressure and grave injustice has been done to the convict.


Also read: 7 years after 16 December gang rape case, rape conviction rate low at 32%


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

1 COMMENT

  1. This is how delays start. First the Supreme Court refused to find time to hear this case even though there was national outrage. Years have gone by. Finally, the sentence was confirmed. Then the convict didn’t ask for a review, choosing to file a mercy petition. A year later, the convict wants to review the decision – a decision that was itself a review of a lower court decision. Most of this is not required by law. It is simply a creation of the Supreme Court, which has historically never shown any concern for the victims or their families.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular