scorecardresearch
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaGovernanceEditors Guild of India slams Rahul Gandhi for calling ANI editor-in-chief 'pliable'

Editors Guild of India slams Rahul Gandhi for calling ANI editor-in-chief ‘pliable’

Follow Us :
Text Size:

The Congress president had said ANI editor-in-chief Smita Prakash’s interview with Prime Minister Narendra Modi was ‘staged’. 

New Delhi: The Editors Guild of India has slammed Congress president Rahul Gandhi for criticising ANI editor-in-chief Smita Prakash over her interview of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while also calling out other political leaders for using derogatory terms for journalists.

Prakash had interviewed Modi Tuesday, in which he had answered questions on several issues such as the BJP’s recent defeat in assembly polls in three states.

The Congress chief had Wednesday called the television interview “staged” and said that it was conducted by a “pliable” journalist. His comments drew flak from all corners, including Prakash, who described his comments as a “cheap shot” in a tweet.

The Editors Guild too called out the labelling of journalists. “The Guild believes journalists should claim no immunity from healthy and civilised criticism,” it said in a statement.

“At the same time, labelling of journalists has emerged as a favourite tactic on the part of the establishment to discredit, delegitimise and intimidate them,” it added.


Also read: Rahul Gandhi wants 20 minutes for a one-on-one debate with Modi on Rafale


‘A common tactic by all parties’

The Guild statement further said that the political class has been using the tactic of labelling journalists for some time now.

“In the recent past, top BJP leaders, as well as those of AAP, have used unambiguously abusive expressions such as presstitute, news traders, bazaaru (saleable commodities) or dalals (pimps) for journalists,” the statement said.

It added that such abusive words have been combined with ploys such as boycotts, denial of access, and lately government accreditation, which adds up to a “reprehensible” strategy to throttle media freedom.

The Guild said that this must be reversed.

“Journalists, we believe, will continue to deal with these with their usual thick skins and not let these tactics intimidate them,” the statement added. “The Guild, as an apex, non-partisan institution, however, takes strong exception to this tendency and calls for its halt.”


Also read: Modi wave isn’t waning & people are with me, PM Modi claims months before elections


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

2 COMMENTS

  1. Without getting into the specifics of this case, it is undeniably true that some journalists have become camp followers. May have happened since the dawn of time, but it seems more striking nowadays. It has come to a stage where I just do not read columns by particular individuals, virtually do not watch some prominent channels.

  2. It’s laughable. Press don’t have any immunity from criticism. There is no doubt that interview was staged. Said Ms. Prakash was nodding like an obedient servant. She didn’t try to ask counter questions when Mr. Modi come up with baseless claim. It’s high time that journalists should accept the fact that “paid news” is a reality.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular