New Delhi: The evaluation of undergraduate students in general courses across colleges and universities is soon set to change from a fixed pen and paper exam-based method to a continuous evaluation system.
As a result, students will have make paper presentations, take part in group discussions and write unit tests at the end of each chapter apart from the year-end exam.
The University Grants Commission (UGC) has prepared the new evaluation scheme, which it will soon circulate to all institutions. Under this scheme, universities will also have the freedom to do away with the year-end examination if they want.
According to the proposed evaluation method, 70 per cent weightage will be given to formative assessment that will include activities such as quizzes, projects, group discussions, paper presentations, essays, posters and other similar work.
Summative assessment, which was so far 100 per cent of the evaluation, will now be limited to 30 per cent. It will include unit tests, semester-end and year-end examinations.
Most colleges as of now have only year-end and semester exams; they do not continuously assess students. With the new evaluation method, UGC wants to ensure the institutions move towards a continuous assessment method.
“The idea of moving towards a continuous evaluation method is a move away from rote learning and to make learning interesting for students,” UGC Vice-Chairman Bhushan Patwardhan told ThePrint. “The new evaluation scheme has been formulated by a committee of experts appointed by the commission and will soon be made official by the HRD minister.”
We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.
Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.
The committee behind proposal
The committee that suggested the evaluation reforms was headed by professor M.M. Salunkhe, president, Association of Indian Universities (AIU).
Its continuous evaluation idea, which UGC is attempting to replicate in the higher education system, was also tried in the school education level in the form of the Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCEA).
Under CCEA, students up to Class 10 did not have to write exams but were evaluated throughout the year. The idea, however, failed at the school level and examinations had to be brought back, doing away with the no-detention policy.
Some private universities such as the Azim Premji University and Ashoka University already follow the continuous evaluation process. Students are evaluated throughout the year on the basis of classwork, projects, paper presentations among other things. Their evaluation is not limited to only a term-end examination.
‘Will be tough to replicate in colleges’
Rajesh Jha, a Delhi University teacher felt that something like this would be difficult to replicate in a government institution.
“One has to see the size of our classrooms; there are 60 students in one class,” Jha told ThePrint. “How are we going to be able to do internal assessment with things like group discussions and poster making with them?
“What are we going to teach the students anyway by poster-making? If the government wants a curriculum that makes students more creative and develops their critical ability, they should assess this scheme properly before implementation,” he added.
While students in private universities that already have a continuous evaluation method seemed happy with the arrangement, those in government institutions seemed apprehensive.
“We keep interacting with students and they tell us that they don’t want internal assessment. They want 100 per cent weightage for exams,” Jha said.
News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it
You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.
You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.
We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.
At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.
This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.
If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.