scorecardresearch
Friday, April 19, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaEducationCAG flags 'irregularities worth crores' in IIM Rohtak's accounts, institute says nothing...

CAG flags ‘irregularities worth crores’ in IIM Rohtak’s accounts, institute says nothing wrong

Report says institute not eligible for Rs 48.90-cr tax exemption, mentions ‘exorbitant fees’, ‘violation of not-for-profit motive’. IIM justifies finances, says it's exempt under IT Act.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), in its audit of the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) at Rohtak, has found alleged financial irregularities worth crores in the business school’s accounts, ThePrint has learnt.

The IIM, in a detailed response sent to ThePrint, has justified its finances.

The CAG’s ‘Audit and Inspection Report on the accounts of the Director IIM Rohtak for the year 2019-21’ states that the institute received a tax exemption of Rs 48.90 crore for which it was not “eligible”.

The report, accessed by ThePrint, says that according to Section 10 (23C) (iiiab) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, any income received by a person on behalf of any university or any educational institution existing solely for educational purposes and not for purposes of profit, and which is wholly or substantially financed by the government, is entitled to exemption. Further, going by the rules, only if the institution receives at least 50 per cent of grants from the government will it qualify for tax exemption.

This, however, is not the case with IIM Rohtak, it adds.

According to the audit report, grants from the government to IIM Rohtak have been below the 50 per cent threshold every year from the 2015-16 to the 2018-19 academic session.

“Maximum grant the institute received was 31.20 per cent of the total grant received in the year 2017-18. So, the institute is not substantially financed by the government as it receives grants below the 50 per cent threshold,” reads the report.

Consequently, the institute is not entitled to claim exemption from payment of income tax amounting to Rs 48.90 crore in its surplus income of Rs 157.18 crore during financial years 2015-16 to 2020-21, it adds.

The report also states that the institute has “charged exorbitant fees” from students, which could have been “avoided”.

“The fees structure is so designed that the receipts are two-three times the expenditure of the institute and that too is on an increasing trend year to year,” the CAG report reads.

It adds: “Instead of being invested in growth of institute and utilised on conducting research work, the funds amounting to Rs 251,96,45,000 were deposited in fixed accounts (term deposits) in banks, on which interest amounting to Rs 17,68,22,281 was earned.”

The increasing trend of revenue over expenditure year to year “forfeits the not-for-profit intent” of the institute, the report points out.


Also read: No dearth of applications but older IIMs lack caste diversity, reveals enrolment data


Replies submitted, under consideration, says IIM Rohtak

ThePrint sent a detailed questionnaire to IIM Rohtak asking for a response on the tax and fee issue.

The institute, in a reply for the exorbitant fees mentioned in the CAG audit, said: “The annual fee is dependent on several factors, including annual student intake, yearly institute expenditure, future expansion plans, fee of peer institutes, etc. and many others. For the last five years, the institute has only been increasing fees on the basis of inflation each year and the institute did not increase fees in 2021 due to the COVID situation.”

“Also, it may be safe to conclude that the total fee charged by IIM Rohtak is the lowest fees among the 20 IIMs that exist today,” it added.

On the point of being ineligible for tax exemption, it said: “IIM Rohtak is exempted under Income Tax Act, 1961, as per provisions of Section 10(23C)(iiiab) for the financial year 2019-2020 and Section 10(23C)(vi) for the financial year 2020-2021.”

It added that “the CAG report is a draft report on which replies have been submitted formally and are under consideration”.

However, in the copy of the report accessed by ThePrint, the auditor has mentioned all the replies given by the institute and expressed its remarks.

(Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui)


Also read: Sportspersons, spies & more women on rolls, IIMs & ISB aim to break B-school stereotype


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular