scorecardresearch
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeFeaturesBrandmaPicturpost, once the commuter's favourite film magazine, is now a prized collector's...

Picturpost, once the commuter’s favourite film magazine, is now a prized collector’s item

The pocket-sized film magazine featured actual movie posters as covers, which make it a prized possession for film enthusiasts these days.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

Back in the day when smartphones and tablets didn’t exist and newspapers and magazines were what the average commuter relied on to pass the time, pocket-sized film magazine Picturpost was their best friend.

Launched sometime in the 1940s, the monthly magazine, published from Madras, was easier to carry around and read on public transport than Filmfare or CineBlitz. The latter were quite large and thick, averaging 100-130 pages per edition while Picturpost was much smaller in size and typically consisted of about 50 pages.

While its sister concern, Pesum Padam, extensively covered Tamil cinema, Picturpost focused on Hindi movies. “One could find an article or two covering films or stars from the South too, but the focus was on Hindi cinema,” says Dhruv Somani, a textile industrialist and film memorabilia collector who has also written a four-volume series on horror in Hindi cinema, called A Touch of Evil.


Also read: Cricket Samrat, the magazine that religiously spread the gospel of cricket for 42 years


A collector’s item 

Today, an edition of Picturpost is more valuable than Filmfare or some of the others, because of how difficult it is to find. “It’s a very rare magazine, so people who are in possession of it don’t even post pictures online in fear that they’d be copy-pasted,” Somani explains. “If you want to buy a Filmfare edition from the ’70s, it would cost you about Rs 700, while a Picturpost from the same time would be somewhere around Rs 1,200-1,500.”

It was known for covering upcoming releases while going into granular details about a film’s cast and plot. Many of its covers were actual movie posters, which make it a prized possession for film enthusiasts these days.

While Somani is a proud owner of a 1965 edition that he had been hunting down for quite some time for the poster of Gumnaam (1965), starring Manoj Kumar, on its cover, some of its other sought-after covers were the one featuring a young Govinda, the poster of Dharmendra and Saira Banu’s Jwaar Bhata (1973) and one of Rajesh Khanna and Sharmila Tagore’s Safar (1970).

One of Picturpost's covers was the post of the movie Gumnaam | Photo by special arrangement
One of Picturpost’s covers was the post of the movie Gumnaam | Photo by special arrangement

Also read: Bharat Ek Khoj: Shyam Benegal’s adaption of Nehru’s Discovery of India was a Sunday staple


Detailed reviews, quality pictures

Picturpost was neither as controversial as Baburao Patel’s FilmIndia nor as glamorous as Filmfare; its sober tone and attention to detail was what made it such a favourite. Somani reminisces that this was a magazine that gave you in-depth information on cinema happenings sans the gossip that many Bollywood magazines are notorious for.

While competitors Filmfare and CineBlitz used glossy paper and glossed-up photographs, Picturpost‘s photographs have a slight matte finish to them, which makes them even more desirable. “The images were top class in quality and were the USP of the magazine,” Sumant Batra, founder of Cinemaazi, a digital repository of Indian cinema, tells ThePrint.

Picturpost was known for its covers, which often featured movie posters and had a matte finish | Photo by special arrangement
Picturpost was known for its covers, which often featured movie posters and had a matte finish | Photo by special arrangement

The magazine was also popular for how it platformed cinema’s rising stars and newcomers. Film critic Ulhas Shirke wrote that one of its editors was film historian Firoze Rangoonwala, whose policy was to carry an interview of a newcomer and an established star in every edition. While not many publications were keen to give space to newbies, Picturpost was an exception, he wrote.

With time Picturpost also changed, in that while one could find political commentary in its initial years up to about the ’60s, the magazine dropped political commentary to exclusively cover Bollywood and all things cinema, notes Somani. “Its later editions were also bigger in size and towards its end, the magazine wasn’t the size of your typical Reader’s Digest anymore,” Somani says.

The magazine shut down in 1988, but its gorgeous posters and photographs, and it’s in-depth analysis of the movies, remains with readers to this day.


Also read: Chandrakanta, the show in which Irrfan won hearts four lines at a time


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular