File photo of Urjit Patel | Olivier Douliery/Bloomberg
File photo of Urjit Patel | Olivier Douliery/Bloomberg
Text Size:

The loss of Patel adds another layer of risk to monetary policy amid economic threats both foreign and domestic.

Mumbai: Urjit Patel’s shock exit as governor of the Reserve Bank of India dealt investors another bout of monetary policy uncertainty when they were already bracing for an electoral test of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Patel, who was nine months from the end of his three-year term as governor, roiled financial markets and surprised the government by quitting on Monday, citing “personal reasons.”

He did so ahead of a board meeting on Friday, at which government representatives are expected to push the RBI to do more to ease a cash crunch and hand over more of its excess capital. State election results due Tuesday were already adding to investors’ nervousness before a national election next year.

The loss of Patel adds another layer of risk to monetary policy amid economic threats both foreign and domestic. The rupee is among the worst performers in Asia this year, the economy is weakening and the banking sector is in crisis.

“Short-term political gain but with potentially incalculable long-term damage to the commitment to credible economic policy” is how Vivek Dehejia, an associate professor of economics at Carleton University in Ottawa, described on Twitter the consequence of Patel’s exit. It “is a very tragic day for India and for sound economics.”

Stocks and bonds are set to slump on Tuesday, while the rupee may weaken after forward contracts dropped on news of Patel’s departure. Futures on the Nifty 50 Index extended declines Tuesday, sliding as much as 2.4 per cent.

Patel, who succeeded Raghuram Rajan in September 2016, has been at loggerheads with the finance ministry, which wants the RBI to ease lending restrictions on some banks and has opposed higher interest rates in the past. The differences were thrown into the open when Deputy Governor Viral Acharya used an October speech to defend the central bank’s independence and warned of a market backlash should it be undermined.

Patel has tried to burnish the RBI’s credentials as an inflation-fighting central bank. After hiking interest rates twice this year, the RBI left rates unchanged last week, while giving itself room to move again by sticking to its “calibrated tightening” stance.

The exit of Patel may lead to a less hawkish bias at the RBI and could mean a rate cut returning to the agenda as soon as February, said Abhishek Gupta at Bloomberg Economics in Mumbai.

Investors will hope for a credible successor who’ll bring continuity, said economists at Citigroup Inc. They noted that nine of the bank’s governors since 1970 have had previous experience in institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, and pointed out that it took more than two months to replace Rajan.

Oxford-trained Patel, who has shunned the public spotlight as governor, was initially seen as a Modi ally after he appeared to back the prime minister’s controversial ban on high-value currency notes in November 2016, which hurt the economy and led to thousands of job losses. Since then, he has battled to get India’s struggling banking system in order and punish errant borrowers who have stopped servicing their debt even though they have the ability to pay.

Patel tightened rules on weak state-run banks earlier this year, restricting their ability to lend. The government wants the RBI to relax the rules so banks can lend more easily and keep the economic engines firing ahead of a general election next year. It also wants the central bank to hand over more of its excess capital.

The Indian central bank is not alone in facing political heat, with challenges to the independence of monetary policy makers a theme of 2018. The Federal Reserve has weathered criticism from U.S. President Donald Trump, while counterparts in Turkey and the U.K. have also been pressured by policy makers.

“Looking back, this doesn’t surprise me,” said R. Gandhi, a former deputy governor of the RBI. “The differences between the RBI and the government were public, and this will be seen as a fallout of that.”-Bloomberg

Check out My543, our comprehensive report card of all Lok Sabha MPs.

1 Comment Share Your Views


  1. I think Dr Patel’s role in demonetisation has been misunderstood. He was never a supporter of the move. It came barely two months into his term, like a meteor strike. He could not have embarrassed the government by publicly criticising the move or the complete lack of preparation for so consequential a decision, starting with printing of a sufficient quantity of alternate currency. However, after that storm had passed, he – and most Indians – would have expected the economic team to observe a certain humility and restraint in once again stirring the pot. The growing confrontation between the government and the central bank belied that perfectly reasonable hope. It is possible to discern a certain recklessness, bordering on panic, in how this has played out.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here