India and China may have faced-off for 73 days in Doklam last year, but naval officers of the two countries had a reunion on the high seas. ThePrint listens in.
The reasons for both sides preventing any escalation lie in the political and military context of the strategic situation in West Asia within the larger global geopolitical framework.
Economists say there are weaknesses in India’s GDP data. But statisticians claim the accusations are based on flawed understanding, saying while GDP has problems, the economists are looking in the wrong places.
Coaching centres for Army aspirants in Jhunjhunu are shutting down due to plummeting admissions in the face of a lack of job guarantees under Agnipath Scheme.
Now this article is a good example of a good message written with questionable motivation. The sixth, or the seventh paragraph maybe has been addressed to a certain type of people. What exactly was the thinking in the writer’s mind before typing that? What kind of message was he trying to send, and more importantly, to whom? That paragraph, and a few words here and there changed the entire time of this article. Instead of looking like a piece of info indicating an air of harmony between the rivals, it sounded like an agenda driven post.
Sometimes before writing a piece, you should think, do people always have to get riled up for littlest of things? Was this news important enough to call out people? Does everything has to be interpreted in a partisan way? And do not fool yourself or anyone else by saying that there wasn’t any such thinking before publishing this article.
See, there are people in this country who believe in independent thinking. Who do not fall left or right for everything. And those people want fair news, if you know what that means. To my dismay, I see less and less of that everyday. I hope you understand what I mean and think about it.
Thank You
“Rapists, lynchers, misogynysts, haters, listen in.
Listen in to the international maritime radio frequency, Channel 16.
This is how those at sea talk.”
what does this mean? What is the relevance of those lines in this article? Is this the level of journalism Shekhar Gupta and other famous journalists associated with “The Print” promote!
What a shitty article…has nothing substantial.
Now this article is a good example of a good message written with questionable motivation. The sixth, or the seventh paragraph maybe has been addressed to a certain type of people. What exactly was the thinking in the writer’s mind before typing that? What kind of message was he trying to send, and more importantly, to whom? That paragraph, and a few words here and there changed the entire time of this article. Instead of looking like a piece of info indicating an air of harmony between the rivals, it sounded like an agenda driven post.
Sometimes before writing a piece, you should think, do people always have to get riled up for littlest of things? Was this news important enough to call out people? Does everything has to be interpreted in a partisan way? And do not fool yourself or anyone else by saying that there wasn’t any such thinking before publishing this article.
See, there are people in this country who believe in independent thinking. Who do not fall left or right for everything. And those people want fair news, if you know what that means. To my dismay, I see less and less of that everyday. I hope you understand what I mean and think about it.
Thank You
Dear sir why making news international interaction are a healthy sign, but be cautious also
“Rapists, lynchers, misogynysts, haters, listen in.
Listen in to the international maritime radio frequency, Channel 16.
This is how those at sea talk.”
what does this mean? What is the relevance of those lines in this article? Is this the level of journalism Shekhar Gupta and other famous journalists associated with “The Print” promote!