Cut to eighty years later. How much privatisation has taken place in the last eleven years. Ask anyone in the SME sector how easy it is to do business in India today.
Even though this article was written in 1960s I still think what is written here deserves a dislike and I wish Print would understand this request of mine. Secondly, Nehru and the Congress belonged to the period of that era which just came out of the exploitive rule of the Raj and what were the policies of Raj? I don’t think I have to describe them. So Nehru did what he had to do cause he was in an era where majority of the population was uneducated and under poverty who were exploited by the Raj. During that era Socialism was the famous idea especially due to the success of USSR. The author talked about how they decided pre independence that Socialism would be the policy to move forward with and gives example of abolition of landownership was a dictatorial act rather than democratic and this is the most absurd and bullshit statement ever made. I guess the author never knew of the Karachi Session of the Congress and how is the abolition of zamindaris who were a tool of the Raj who actually forced people to pay and never actually worked or invested in the land dictatorial? Like how stupid can you be? Well maybe the author was angry that he lost his land and could not exploit his dear Indians anymore. He talks allot of things but says nothing just technical jargon to sound intellectual. He could have made an argument about how Nehru could have done something else but he makes stupid arguments.
Outdated neoliberal understanding which stands completely exposed in the current world when under our very eye the alternative system, i.e. neoliberal western world constructed on the rampant loot and plunder of global south is crumbling.
Jawaharlal Nehru singlehandedly led India into socialist misery. To give the readers an idea about how much did we suffer because of socialism, Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar mentions, “India has suffered a major human tragedy because of its prolonged experiment with socialism, and its delay in introducing economic reforms that accelerated growth. The most horrifying consequence has been 14.5 million ‘missing children’. Almost as bad are the 261 million ‘missing literates’ and 109 million ‘missing non-poor'”.
Cut to eighty years later. How much privatisation has taken place in the last eleven years. Ask anyone in the SME sector how easy it is to do business in India today.
Even though this article was written in 1960s I still think what is written here deserves a dislike and I wish Print would understand this request of mine. Secondly, Nehru and the Congress belonged to the period of that era which just came out of the exploitive rule of the Raj and what were the policies of Raj? I don’t think I have to describe them. So Nehru did what he had to do cause he was in an era where majority of the population was uneducated and under poverty who were exploited by the Raj. During that era Socialism was the famous idea especially due to the success of USSR. The author talked about how they decided pre independence that Socialism would be the policy to move forward with and gives example of abolition of landownership was a dictatorial act rather than democratic and this is the most absurd and bullshit statement ever made. I guess the author never knew of the Karachi Session of the Congress and how is the abolition of zamindaris who were a tool of the Raj who actually forced people to pay and never actually worked or invested in the land dictatorial? Like how stupid can you be? Well maybe the author was angry that he lost his land and could not exploit his dear Indians anymore. He talks allot of things but says nothing just technical jargon to sound intellectual. He could have made an argument about how Nehru could have done something else but he makes stupid arguments.
Outdated neoliberal understanding which stands completely exposed in the current world when under our very eye the alternative system, i.e. neoliberal western world constructed on the rampant loot and plunder of global south is crumbling.
Jawaharlal Nehru singlehandedly led India into socialist misery. To give the readers an idea about how much did we suffer because of socialism, Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar mentions, “India has suffered a major human tragedy because of its prolonged experiment with socialism, and its delay in introducing economic reforms that accelerated growth. The most horrifying consequence has been 14.5 million ‘missing children’. Almost as bad are the 261 million ‘missing literates’ and 109 million ‘missing non-poor'”.