So far what we have seen of the 2024 elections is enough to indicate that the continuous slide of democratic standards is headed toward breaching the minimum threshold of an electoral democracy.
While releasing 'India Employment Report 2024', V Anantha Nageswaran said govt can't solve 'all social, economic challenges'. Congress leader Kharge says CEA protecting 'dear leader'.
Sitharaman, who is only the second woman defence minister in India's history, is expected to work closely with the Finance Minister to take key industry-related decisions
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
The title is misleading and meant to catch attention for views during a divisive time. The entire article focuses on bashing China but fails to link it to the attack or provide any meaningful evidence.
The author has missed the most critical factor in the matter of Indo-China relationship–that is the long cherished dream of Communist China to gulo India as a whole. Whatever the “next government” seeks to do through its foreign policy, it is impossible to bring about a ‘change of heart” in the communist China’s leadership, with the hone grown anti_national Left supporting g the ancient country. China cares two hoots for the relationship between the two ancient civilisations of the two countries or the infamous lotus eater’s pet slogan of “Hindi- Chini bhai bhai”. China must occupy India–that’s all. And the communists of India are too eager to make it possible.
The author with a reputation of an “expert” belies the title of the article by devoting just the last para to Chins’a culpability for Pulwama. He has not provided a shred of evidence to connect China with this particular terror strike.
As they say in Bollywood, China and Pakistan are an item. Two migraines, for the price of one. Not because we love them or have any illusions, but it would be in our own best interest to have a trilateral dialogue and find a more productive way to coexist.
The title is misleading and meant to catch attention for views during a divisive time. The entire article focuses on bashing China but fails to link it to the attack or provide any meaningful evidence.
The author has missed the most critical factor in the matter of Indo-China relationship–that is the long cherished dream of Communist China to gulo India as a whole. Whatever the “next government” seeks to do through its foreign policy, it is impossible to bring about a ‘change of heart” in the communist China’s leadership, with the hone grown anti_national Left supporting g the ancient country. China cares two hoots for the relationship between the two ancient civilisations of the two countries or the infamous lotus eater’s pet slogan of “Hindi- Chini bhai bhai”. China must occupy India–that’s all. And the communists of India are too eager to make it possible.
The author with a reputation of an “expert” belies the title of the article by devoting just the last para to Chins’a culpability for Pulwama. He has not provided a shred of evidence to connect China with this particular terror strike.
As they say in Bollywood, China and Pakistan are an item. Two migraines, for the price of one. Not because we love them or have any illusions, but it would be in our own best interest to have a trilateral dialogue and find a more productive way to coexist.