scorecardresearch
Saturday, April 20, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionIndia's exports won't grow, and the Modi govt's idea of tariff hikes...

India’s exports won’t grow, and the Modi govt’s idea of tariff hikes is unlikely to help

Follow Us :
Text Size:

Indian exporters do not have strong negotiating positions with buyers, and therefore tend to get squeezed out disproportionately when trade hits a rough patch.

Back in 2011-12, India’s goods exports — excluding mineral fuels (oil and coal) because their sharp price swings distort the picture — totalled $249 billion. Five years later, in 2016-17, the figure was virtually unchanged at $243 billion. The highest level that the figure reached in the intervening years was $253 billion, in 2014-15. This has been a lost half-decade for India’s exporters — yet the subject has scarcely figured in any economic debate. The current year finally sees the prospect of some change, with a bit of an export surge in recent months, but the full year’s growth may be no more than 10 per cent — poor pickings after five years of flat-lining. During these five years, GDP (gross domestic product) in current dollars has grown by 24 per cent. In relation to the size of the total economy, therefore, exports excluding mineral fuels have shrunk from 13.7 per cent to 10.7 per cent — a clear reversal of trend.

The striking thing about this period is that it has been quite unlike previous ones. In the decade of the 1990s, the country’s goods exports, excluding mineral fuel, grew by a creditable 140 per cent; the decade that followed was even better, with exports growing by an impressive 397 per cent, from $42 million to $209 billion (both numbers excluding mineral fuel). Exports in relation to GDP also saw a sharp increase, as India became more of a trading nation than it had been for at least half a century.

A picture of TN Ninan, chairman of Business Standard Private LimitedThese trends are of course related to the state of the world economy, and of world trade. The years of fastest export growth were also the ones when the world economy was in overdrive. In more recent years, global growth has reverted to its normal pace of about 3.5 per cent. World trade was growing slowly till 2014, then suffered a notable dip in 2015 and 2016 but has recovered since. However, until the most recent months, India did not share in that trade revival. It hardly needs re-stating that an essential element of rapid economic growth is rapid export growth. The lack of export growth in recent years has certainly been one reason for the loss of general economic momentum.

The usual arguments about what limits India’s exports (poor transport infrastructure, high cost of finance, shortage of electricity, no ease of doing business, etc.) do not explain the five-year-long stagnation, since these factors were in operation earlier too. If anything, the power and transport situation has got better — the country has surplus capacity in both electricity and ports, while the highways have improved. If one had to look for what has changed, a perennial candidate is the rupee’s external value, which is generally acknowledged to be ruling too high for exporter comfort. But the figures show that the rupee was much more expensive in 2011 (about 45 to the US dollar), fell quite sharply in 2012 and 2013, reaching 65 to the dollar before climbing to 60 by early 2014, and then dropping back to 65, where it is now. If exporters have to deal with an overvalued currency today, they were doing so in spades during the period that saw export growth.

If the explanation for the loss of export momentum lies elsewhere, then no one has figured out what exactly it is. There could be sectoral issues that provide some of the answers, but these are unlikely to be the full story. Perhaps it is simply the case that Indian exporters do not have strong negotiating positions with buyers, and therefore tend to get squeezed out disproportionately when trade hits a rough patch. Whatever the explanation, one can say with confidence that the government’s recent focus on protecting the home market through tariff hikes is unlikely to help exporters. Whether it will serve the cause of import substitution remains to be seen. Even if it does, it will nudge the economy towards higher-cost production, and that is not going to help exports.

By special arrangement with Business Standard

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

3 COMMENTS

  1. This ignores the real problem: an overvalued Rupee. With all global markets on an upswing, unemployment levels at record low levels India is missing out. A 5-7% devaluation will change India’s fortunes and may even bring back BJP next year.

  2. It indeed is sectoral. For instance, IT services exports have virtually become now a slow growth industry owing to maturity of the industry and not as many low hanging fruit; likewise indian pharmaceutical exports are suffering dramatic price erosion. Other sectors too might be facing similar challenges. We need newer growth engines and unfortunately they have been very slow to come by.

  3. No obvious answers suggest themselves after reading the column. There is another reason to exclude exports of petroleum products and even gems and jewellery for the purpose of studying trends of export growth, for there is much lower value added, as compared to say, exports of automobiles or engineering goods. The focus, to reduce the merchandise trade deficit, will have to be on manufactured goods, with high local content. The sharp turn towards protectionism will not help, for it will insulate the Indian economy, make it even less globally competitive. At a time when remittances and software exports are levelling off, we cannot sustain a trade deficit approaching $ 200 billion a year.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular